Mexicans beat Dexicans


Keep them on
By Dingy Bags
June 14 2012

Hola gringos!

I am afraid it was the same old story at Lord’s tonight. Middlesex started both innings really well but could not sustain things, although funnily enough there were two or three overs when, had the rain set in at that point, we would have won.

Bumped into Fozzie and we tried to access Upper Tavern but were refused entry. Then Ged, once of this parish, said that his party were going up there so we tried another steward and were allowed up. It would be useful to sit under cover. Alas, we soon spotted Kev sitting in the third row. which was out in the open, so we were to get a bit wet later.

Inevitably, we lost the toss but were put into the field which might have been what we wanted. Our line-up had plenty of all-rounders, with Tom Smith at 11 but the bowling had an inexperienced look. Rayner opened the bowling with a tidy start and, after Davies had taken two fours off Crook H-Brown was bowled. Toby took the third over and got a wicket first ball, Davies caught by Simmo. In fact, Toby’s first two overs cost only four runs and Bergie and smudge also got wickets with their first balls. End of the powerplay 32-3, then Smudge got his wicket and then off for rain. Back on shortly for five balls but then off again.

It was looking good for us at this stsge

Surprisingly, when they started for a third time it was still a twenty over game. They didn’t lose another wicket. Spriegel and Wilson went sensibly to start with and only really accelerated in the last four overs. The first six wasn’t until the ninth over (Wilson off Smudge) and even in the fourteenth Crookie started with four dot balls. Still, 150 was a stiff-looking target.

It looked even harder after the first ball of the second over, Meaker bouncing Denly who hooked gently to deep square leg. If he had really tried to hit it he’d have got a six. As H-Brown rang the changes – first four overs bowled by four different gasmen – Nannes took the third and Stirling hit him for three fours and a two. In the fifth over (Meaker) Mala took two fours and in the sixth (Spriegel) Mala took two fours and Stirlo a six. So, our powerplay produced 53-1. Had it rained then, or in the next over or two, we would have won. Seaxe Man will remind you that the powerplay is often the most crucial part of a T20 innings: tonight was an exception. From the moment Mala was lbw to Batty in the eigth over we lost seven wickets for 22 runs, all to spinners. Battty got Stirlo (running down the wicket and round his legs) and Bergie (forward defensive) both bowled in consecutive balls and that was it. One word in defence of Buck – it looked like the rain was coming and he tried to clear long-on (only just failed) to get us back above the Vera.

In fact, we played on for another four and a half overs, including the sight of the opposition captain lobbing a few deliveries up in the air and inviting our batsmen to do the same: Simmo and Crookie both out for nought.

As late as the fifteenth over, now eight down, we had more runs than they had had at that stage (95/91) and I had not completely given up hope with Ollie and Toby timing it nicely and getting ready for the last four overs that never were.  I think that shows how much of a panic, frankly, we seemed to get into against the four spinners we faced. You could make the excuse of the weather and the need to get up above the rate but the point is we were well ahead of the rate and sensible cricket could have kept us there, having got to the point where we needed 86 to win with nine wickets in hand.


The crowd was only moderately sized given the weather but at least we got a game in and have not lost the money, as other counties have done. Scant consolation.
 


 

Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: Middlesex till we die (IP Logged)
Date: 14/06/2012 23:26

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:06:18:05:01:44 by The Diamond ruled ok.

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 14/06/2012 23:32

Thanks Dingy nicely summed up. I still can't get over how in this form we get ourselves in decent positions and then consistently it goes horribly wrong.

When off for rain I said to Fozzie and Dingy I would rather us lose then no result, but after this not sure what's worse.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: lower pavilion (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 00:21

Good report.

It is indeed very frustrating. I think you could argue that for large parts of the game we were the better side.

It does seem to be a habit that in this form of the game we frequently get ourselves into winning positions and then somehow manage to lose.

It is even more frustrating when it happens against The Mexicans.

Oh well, sunday is another day. lets hope the weather is kinder and we get a win.

That is enough posting i really must get some sleep.

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: antryg (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 08:52

I hope the crowd was large enough for us to make some money out of it.

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: Haringey Racer (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 10:39

Quote:
lower pavilion
It does seem to be a habit that in this form of the game we frequently get ourselves into winning positions and then somehow manage to lose.


That's the nature of the format, though. Two or three quick wickets can turn a game on its head. I'm sure all counties can point to games where the same has happened to them.

All credit to Wilson and Spriegel for a splendid rescue job on their innings and on Batty in particular for strangling ours.

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 11:30

For some reason the last two paragraphs were omitted from report. I will rectify this evening.


As late as the fifteenth over, now eight down, we had more runs than they had had at that stage (95/91) and I had not completely given up hope with Ollie and Toby timing it nicely and getting ready for the last four overs that never were.  I think that shows how much of a panic, frankly, we seemed to get into against the four spinners we faced. You could make the excuse of the weather and the need to get up above the rate but the point is we were well ahead of the rate and sensible cricket could have kept us there, having got to the point where we needed 86 to win with nine wickets in hand.
The crowd was only moderately sized given the weather but at least we got a game in and have not lost the money, as other counties have done. Scant consolation.
 

 

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 18:51

Report updated. Interesting point regarding crowd size. The Times report said ground was only half full. I reckon was less than that and estimate 10,000. Outside factors did have an influence.

The atmosphere was awful and there appeared to be no audible cheering for any success. It was mainly an after work crowd so guess that was why not many team colours visible. There were loads of clearly non cricket types in the crowd.

While I didn't enjoy myself will be back for more punishment Sunday.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: Sussex Seaxe (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 18:59

Interesting that there were loads of 'non cricket types' in the crowd. When T20 started I seem to remember that getting these types in and educating them so that they would return for proper cricket was the aim? That all seems forgotten now and it is just about getting bums on seats, and even that seems to be a reducing number year on year.

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 19:15

The side "entertainment" if you want to call it that, is clearly non cricket orientated. Ineberation seems to be prime concern of many and shame the club don't benefit from bar takings.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: Goldbart (IP Logged)
Date: 15/06/2012 19:25

I reckon 12,000 there last night, many at the back of stands as far away from rain as possible.
remember, that would fill/easily sell out the majority of other grounds across England and so the attendance is still very healthy. however i remember our first T20 game against Surrey in '03...sell out, would love that again. In a recession does INCREASING the prices to £25 for 3 hours cricket really help? More expensive than quite a few Premiership football teams...

Re: Mexicans beat Dexicans
Posted by: Seaxe_Man (IP Logged)
Date: 16/06/2012 10:43

Looked a bit below half fullish. Capacity 28,500. Mebbe 12thou or so.

Good report DB. The lesson to be learned here, is we should have taken a leaf from the Mexicans batting strategy.

Nurdle and conserve wickets for the last five.

Good work by the bowlers and fielders leaving a gettable 150 was not followed up by the batters.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net