Reaction to Lenell John-Lewis' 2007/8
By Nathan Jackson
May 24 2008
Lenell John-Lewis is the final member of the permanent playing staff that we are going to do a review on. Despite scoring just three goals, Lenny's first season as a first team player was a highly impressive one and he certainly seems to be one with a bright future ahead of him.
Lenell John-Lewis in 2007/8 | |
GAMES | 22 |
GOALS | 3 |
MINUTES PLAYED (BASED ON 5 MINUTES ADDED ON TIME) | 1437 |
AVERAGE MINUTES BETWEEN GOALS | 479 |
SHOTS | 23 |
GOALS:SHOTS RATIO (rounded up) | 1:8 |
Lenny's first season as a first team player was just as you'd expect from a young striker. He tried his hardest and although he didn't score many goals, he was certainly more than happy to shoot and his three goals were all a fine finish, especially his first at Stockport.
He is a youngster that is destined to get better as time goes on, and he will almost certainly get better with experience. He is unlikely to be a regular starter next season but his time will come eventually and he certainly has the potential to play higher than League 2.
How come this doesn't apply to Pembleton or Clarke?
Do they have no scope for improvement?
As for Pembleton, the only way he'll improve is if he actually starts makign a decent contribution to more than 1 game from every 6.
Quote:Nathan Jackson
Because I thought Clarke was a bit@#$%&when I saw him playing for the reserve a few years ago and he's still as@#$%&now. He hasn't improved with time.
As for Pembleton, the only way he'll improve is if he actually starts makign a decent contribution to more than 1 game from every 6.
It's a big step from reserve team football to first team football and both Clarke and Pembleton are relatively inexperienced at that level. I don't think you've answered the question.
Why do you think LJL can only improve with experience and the same can't be applied to either Clarke or Pembleton. They are all of the same age and experience I just can't see how you can be so enraptured by one and he is seemingly the only that can improve and yet so dismissive of the other two.
It's not that I necessarily disagree with you, but I'm just trying to understand your logic.
Maybe you should be complimented that people ask you to justify it. There are many posters here who I couldn't give a toss what they think, but you are not one of them. I was simply curious as to how you reached the conclusion about one youngster about his scope to improve - and yet seemingly didn't think that potential lay in others. It wasn't even your opinion about the merits of the player I was questioning. It was the logic you were applying.
I was slightly frustrated as I have on several occasions stuck up for you when others have seen fit to criticise. I disagree with many of your opinions but have always admired your desire to back them up, and have said this several times. I think this was the first time I had put a question directly to you and it was ignored.
If your fed up of justifying your opinions then I think you should pick and chose who you debate with. I don't know it all, but like to think 30+ years has given me some insight and was interested in engaging in a football discussion. If you are happier justifying your opinions to somebody who is posting when they should be doing their homework or others who clearly are not for shifting (certain members of the Marriott Mafia) then so be it.
Don't dodge the difficult questions.
I'd play him on one wing and DNG down the opposite side, especially at home and simply encourage them to attack the full-backs at every opportunity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

