As one door closes another opens
England Opener?
By Grockle
February 25 2010
Craig Kieswetter and Peter Trego have spent the first part of 2010 making their play for full International recognition with the Lions. Both did enough and our young keeper did more than enough! What does that mean to our starting line-up in April?
147 at more than a run a ball opening for England in their first spring tour game has done two things for Young Kieswetter;
Firstly it has confirmed our man is one of the most exciting prospects in the present setup. A real keeper that does more than add a bit of smack at the end of an innings!
Secondly it should put paid to these ludicrous statements that he's some kind of mercenary tourist taking the place of and 'English' keeper that I personally have heard from Messrs Boycott and Martin Jenkins backed up by some on 606.
Meanwhile Trigger still needs to put in some stuff with the little round red thing to conjour up some of the same excitement but if you aren't in the mix you can't help make the cake better can you?
As we now expect to be without Craig for part of the summer there is a big space in the top 5 and a pair of wicket keeping gloves waiting for someone. Unfortunately with Sam Spurway not moving up from second team cricket and Carl Gazzard reading the papers and believing there is more money in the financial sector, we have none of the established faces in the keeping camp.
Enter Jos Buttler (a possible prospect for the Grocklee of 2010). Batsman and prospective keeper. Is he good enough to fill the gap? The people in the know at Taunton seem to think so and he certainly handled the pressure at the end of the season at home and in Hydrabad impressively. But day to day? It'll be new to him but he certainly seems to have something with the bat.
The committee have said that they will go to the loan system if the keeping issue becomes a problem - but can we afford a period of patience while Jos does or doesn't find his feet? I don't think we can seeing as Murali Khatik does not arrive until the season has started and may then have to develop a relationship with his new keeping partner. Jos HAS to hit the ground running and performing. BIG responsibility for a young man and will really show us his mettle as a professional.
Meanwhile what about Peter? If he does make the grade in the summer (and it looks like his main opposition is Luke Wright) then we have an allrounder gap to fill - who will fill it? It means a batsman of top 6 quality with the ability to put in a third/fourth seamer performance to boot.
Within the established squad? Well Wes might have been a possibility - certainly the batting aspect would not have been a problem but the bowling as a) not seam and b) not particularly effective. Arul can offer that extra slow ball aspect but is already an established part of the top 5. Ben Phillips is a possible because he has the proven bowling ability and has been a fair to middling taile end bat but he isn't Peter with the willow. Alfonso? He will be a definite part of the seam attack but could he take on the pressure of the higher batting expectations? Not that sure myself. David Stiff? Certainly gave us some real fun with the big hits in games, expecially that rollicking 45 off not a lot in the Yorkshire run chase but every game at number 6? Nah.
Young names like Haggett, Dibble, Hayter, Burke? Well if there is one looking to make a name for himself then Peter's call up would offer a golden opportunity.
It isn't a problem at the moment but we might be asked to make a short sharp change on little notice. Get the batting gloves on guys and put in that net time!!
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2010:03:07:14:33:19 by Grockle.
Remember we have lost experienced batting cover in Edwards and Durston.
That means should any of the top six lose form, Buttler and Jones haver to come in.
Given the mixed performances of Hildreth and De Bruyn this is a possibility although the latter's bowling shouldn't be overlooked, especially in the absence of Trego.
On the bowling front, Willoughby, Kartik and probably Stiff are inked in with Trego as fifth bowler hopefully with more opportunities.
That just leaves no8. Phillips or Thomas really, neither of whom I can see taking 35 CC wickets.
I can't see Waller or Munday playing much, especially as the management clearly have concerns about their ability to stem the flow of runs at Taunton.
Of course without Kartik at the beginning of the season, there will be even more pressure on the bowlers and you fear opposition batsmen really will be licking their lips in anticipation of playing us at Taunton.
STRONGEST TEAM (all comps)
Trescothick (C)
Suppiah
Compton
Hildreth
De Bruyn
Trego
Kieswetter
Phillips
Stiff
Willoughby
Kartik.
Quote:That just leaves no8. Phillips or Thomas really, neither of whom I can see taking 35 CC wickets.
Despite the fact that Thomas did exactly that last year!? It beggars belief; really it does.
I assume the experienced cover comes from some other season because Neil and Wes only managed 1 innings and 54 runs in first class matches last season (though Wes's innings was not out).
I do struggle to see why Wes wasn't kept as a batsman (but the decision to stay is a two person thing). Neil of course chose to leave - so although lost to us it was his decision not to take the two year offer.
Buttler will play if Craig is kept elsewhere and Jones has taken a year off University for such a chance so why not use him?

Shows how much I know.
Must be all that nonsense I've been spouting.
If Jos gets the gig we'll have to back him all the way,he'll need us behind him not having a dig at his every mistake.
Every career has to start somewhere.
Grab your chance young man.
Saving it all up for Somerset.
For someone of his talent, that would be a tragic waste.
Focus James............FOCUS !!!
Grizzzly
Don't mention the War.
Certainly, Mr Rose was on about three early season games up North and needing an overseas seamer for those games.
Samithai - Amazed that Alf would be released by the Dolphins - you'd think they'd keep him for one-day cricket, even if not needed for the longer stuff?
Grockle - Just because Wes and Neil did not play does not seem, to me, to invalidate the proposition that they were there "as experienced cover," last season. There simply weren't any injuries amongst the batsmen. We seem to me to have been very lucky on that score in recent years.
"This has to go down as one of the greatest days of my life," the 33 year old former South African international said back at the County Ground.
The rest of the story is on the other site.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Still, it's important to distinguish between what statisticians call periodic variation (which, in this case, would be natural periods of better or worse form and/or luck) and secular variation (an identifiable overall trend in one direction or another). I, for one, would want to see a poor patch of longer than 9 games before I conclude he's actually losing it.
And he was, of course, truly excellent in all forms of white-ball cricket throughout.
It's part of a stated policy of focussing resources on developing young, local players, so it may not be entirely a reflection on what Alfie still has to offer.
What can the Duke of E. have meant, though, when he saw Alf`s Somerset CCC imprint on his name badge? "You must be a bowler then." You would have thought Prince Philip would know we only had batters at Taunton.

"Sidelight", cjm? Are you sure?
He or Phillips is going to have to better that to keep us on an even keel next season.
I think there's a real chance we could go into those pre Kartik games without a recognised spinner with a five man seam attack.
Yet even that assumes no injuries. Then it really is up to the Haggetts of this world to come through.
Can't say I feel confident.

Do you really expect us to believe that your assertion that you "couldn't see him taking 35", actually meant couldn't see him doing it AGAIN!
If so, I can only admire your chutzpah!
Aside from that, I dare say he isn't the only seamer who took a higher proportion of his wickets in the first half of the season. I'd also volunteer that the fact that he'd shouldered a heavier-than-expected workload throughout the season should be more than enough to explain, and forgive, some fatigue and tail-off in the latter half.
You also persist in referring to pre-Kartik games, when we are led to believe there will be only one such game in the CC.
I say again, as I've said before, you'd get a lot more mileage for your theories if you didn't so blatantly disregard any facts (and yes, some of them are FACTS) which don't suit your argument.
You would do yourself (and your argument) much greater service if, when presented with the Alfonso figures, for instance, you simply said "Really: then I did the man a disservice", rather than trying to post-rationalise your error.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010:02:26:23:01:40 by Frome Exile.

My point is that I don't believe that Thomas, based on his recent form can be effective enough as a frontline seamer in the CC.
He did indeed start the season well, but the figures quoted underline my point about his recent, worrying form.
You may have full confidence in our seam attack next season. I, based on the facts available, do not.
If Stiff, Turner, Dibble, Haggett and Hayman figure then it drops but if not it's over 30 I think.
Nothing about Alfonso Thomas' perfromances for Somerset suggest he is waning in ability in any way KT. He isn't our first choice in the Championship so how you think he is going to be this really significant aspect of that format puzzles me.
Surely the form of Charl Willoughby and Ben Phillips is much more important along with the development of Stiff, Turner and the younger men over the winter.
That and the contribution of de Bruyn, Trego, Waller and Suppiah during the one game when your supposed saviour of our season, our very own Murali, is unavailable. I'm sure if they don't perform our Championship season will be over before it has begun!!!
Then again it's not worth talking about is it?
Surely it makes no difference who bowls because we will lose or draw at home and fail to do anything significant because of the appalling nature of our wicket while other sides all play on these results pitches that ours quite obviously isn't.

Your point wasn't that Thomas is unlikely to take 35 wickets this season. Your point was that he isn't a 35-wicket-a-season bowler. Only when your error was pointed out did you subtly shift your position. It's so transparent it's laughable.
It's much like your assertion the Stiff isn't a 50-wickets-a-season bowler, which also subtly shifted once it was pointed out to you that his pro-rata return was far better than that!
I also recall how,when he heard that Phil had read the thread dedicated to him he suddenly told the world how much he appreciated the work Phil had done.
There is a word for what he does,but I'd better not use it here.
We'll be accused of faux expectations of common decency and courtesy next!
I hope Phil and his family are well.
And FE.
Your faux fauxness is unlike any fauxness I've seen since visiting Folkstone.
Keep your faux under control.

He’s doing ok considering the circumstances; we ended up talking about computers, Phil knows very little and I was explaining about IP addresses, Private messages, he knows about e/mails.
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
I suppose what the international side needs is a top 5 batsman who also keeps like a specialist and while they've got a keeper in form (Prior), why not have a look at a man who might be a one day specilaist opener but may also be a little more than that. Be something if CK becomes what Bell really still isn't wouldn't it?

Pre-Kartik games is, I believe, correct unless things have changed that I am not aware of. "Pre-Kartik games at Taunton," is, in the context of the CC, incorrect (with the same proviso as in the first sentence.)
I'm pretty sure we were told Kartik would miss the first four CC games, three of which would be "in the North," which was why Brian Rose was meant to be looking for an overseas seamer. In Craig's probable absence, I'd suggest we drop that idea as no quality overseas seamer is liable to be available and sign the kind of solid overseas batsman that would be useful in seaming conditions but is, perhaps, far too "solid," to get into his country's T20 team.
Hasn't R T Ponting retired from all T20 cricket?
I seem to remember the locals at Scarborough having been entirely wowed with his previous CC performance in an SCCC shirt there....
To be fair, unlike the Thomas 35-wicket thing, I don't see any real logical inconsistency in the above.
Stiff may have had a good "pro-rata," return of wickets per game. However, despite Stiff not (to my knowledge) having suffered an injury, Brian Rose/Justin Langer certainly did not pick him at every available opportunity in the CC. And this is despite the fact that we were not exactly slicing through opposing batting line-ups like a knife through butter.
I think Stiff enjoyed quite a bit of luck last season. The man himself was candid enough to say as much on the official website (if I remember rightly.) Whatever the stats might say about his pro-rata return, I think he will need to bowl a good deal better than he did last season if he is take 50 wickets in 2010.
Of course, outside of Charl Willoughby, I shall be quite pleasantly surprised if any of our bowlers achieve 50 CC wickets in 2010.

Throw in a bit of rain along the way, and I think he might struggle to take that many? Missed a few games with injury with Middx as well, I believe, possibly more than one would expect with a slow bowler.
If he plays 12 games and averages four wickets a game, he'd finish just shy of 50 (48). That would be the equivalent of 64 wickets in a full 16 game season and I would not expect any more than 64 wickets from Kartik in a full 16 game season.
I have to say, though, that I think Kartik should be able to help the bowling unit as a whole become more effective even if he does not take 50 wickets in the season. He should provide us with the same kind of control that IDB did and this should mean a lighter workload for Charl (who had to provide both control and penetration last season) and hopefully for Alf Thomas, too. I also look forward to seeing him bowl, in tandem, with young Max Waller who will hopefully benefit from Kartik keeping the batsmen quiet.
I absolutely agree with him that James Hildreth “is more likely to do a Slocombe than a Lathwell.”
Philip Slocombe (like James) was a very good batsman – correct, neat and stylish. He was a player of immense promise and talent who, shortly after making his debut for Somerset, was being talked about as a future Test player.
But then, I seem to recall, his confidence had evaporated to such an extent that he became increasingly bogged down by theories. The result was that his stance at the crease had become markedly sideways on. The early promise had gone, and his great talent was never fulfilled.
Higher recognition of course never came and, born out of frustration, he was lost to the first class game before his rightful time!
I wondered at the time (nearly 30 years ago) whether or not he had been given enough help and encouragement by those then in situ at Somerset.
I hope that the same fate does not befall James Hildreth. The coaches at Somerset should identify any technical flaws in his batting, Angell Face, and work with him to eradicate them.
But time marches on. It is now seven years since his initial appearance for Somerset’s first team.
I am becoming increasingly impatient and nowhere near as confident about him as I once was!
Moving them into line.
Do that.
All will be fine.
