Ed Smith of Middlesex, Kent and England
First Class
By Howard Moon
March 1 2009
Before the new season really does loom into view, it seems appropriate to bid farewell to departing captain Ed Smith, who retired from cricket this winter following both injury and intrigue at Middlesex last season. Howard Moon has written a brilliantly balanced and thoughtful piece which I'm sure will generate a great deal of thought and possibly also comment.
Ed the Duck, Ed0, Smiffy, Smudge: few divided opinion like Ed Smith. Some said he was weak outside off stump, others were shocked he didn’t play more for England. His captaincy style was either Brearley-esque or too autocratic. And his books were applauded by some critics, panned by others, and gave almighty irritation to his team-mates at Kent.
For most of us on the boundary edge, we’ll never truly know how good or bad his technique was, or whether he really did rub people up the wrong way. However, I have rarely let ignorance get in the way of forming an opinion. So, in this spirit: Ed Smith was – for me – one of the most impressive county cricketers of his generation.
It was his history of quiet bloody-mindedness that made him so admirable. This was a batsman who practically bludgeoned his way into the England side in 2003 through sheer weight of runs – 1000 runs by June, and six centuries in consecutive matches; who drove his way to 64 on Test debut, against Ntini, Pollock and co at their peak; who, in late 2004, and only days before cutting all ties with Kent, smashed a stunning one-day century for a team which so clearly hated him; and who last summer, despite breaking an ankle on six, batted on without a runner for thirty more runs to take his team to the brink of victory. (The rest, as they say, is history).

Not a bad looking shot for a man on a broken foot, making history
This was a student who got a double-first at Cambridge while captaining the Blues; an author who found time to pen a riveting diary during a record-breaking summer; a public-school cricketer who wrote about baseball players from the Bronx; and a modern-day Stoic who opted to tough it out at Middlesex despite an awful 2006 (during which, lest we forget, he was dropped – albeit temporarily).
Cricket needs more individuals like Ed Smith. In a world of the anodyne, the sound bite and the media-trained, Smith was a refreshing antidote: a scholar cricketer, as Frank Keating once put it, who could think as well as bat. Perhaps, to my outsider’s eyes at least, it was these thinking qualities which lost him favour at Lord’s last summer. Presumably his eagerness to challenge the status quo won him few friends in the dressing room, but I could be wrong.
In any case, I’ve always felt Smith was underappreciated at Middlesex. He was usually said to be underperforming, but in three full seasons at the club, he hit nearly 4000 first-class runs at 42, chalked up 12 centuries, and generally brought class and experience to an otherwise frail upper-order. Smudge, we’ll miss you. Or I will, at least.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:03:15:07:15:02 by Ged.
Thankfully the new captain is also very likable.
Ed's a grand bloke but I can't say I was heartbroken when he decided to call it a day playing wise , good luck to him with his many other interests though .
Adelaide
Quote:CrookedFinger
Smith was treated shabbily by the club as management caved into player power again.
Here here - said it before, and will say it again. A good thinking skipper. Always set some interesting field positions, captained the side well, and did well at the top of the order. He had another 5 years in him at least, before he was forced out.
Given Joyce, Shah and Strauss have/will be gone for long absences, we could have done with him at the top as a steady hand. He will be sorely missed.
Excellent article by the op.
I see what you were getting at now, and perhaps the old "born to rule" assumption is, or was, part of what got people's backs up. I prefer to have no idea where people were educated and take them as they are. I'm never too keen when people ask casually where you were educated, as it feels like an attempt to establish whether you are part of the same set as they are. Having said that, there can be an inverted snobbery around too, and that's just as bad.
Adelaide
I found Groundie's comments - including the contrast he drew with some other captains and officials - particularly revealing.
