Murtagh Most Foul


Dawid, Compo & Ace
By Dingy Bags
July 19 2009

Many thanks to Dingy Bags for this excellent match report. OK, so it is merely the defunked Pro40, but cricket is cricket and a thrashing of Slurrey is athrashing of Slurrey. And Tim Murtagh removed his kid brother in the mode of removing a small zit ahead of a night on the tiles.

Apparently, no one likes the Pro40 and it’s going to be scrapped. Surrey caught the mood at Guildford today and picked a side without Nel, Batty and that chap who used to bat for us. Middlesex, on the other hand, picked their best side which showed rather more respect to the sizeable crowd that turned up at Woodbridge Road. All the seating – and there was a large temporary stand beside the pavilion, as well as a stand of six or eight rows right along one side of the ground – was pretty much full. I am not much kop at estimating the size of a crowd but 5,000?


English cricket bosses would do well to take note: 40 over cricket is popular, especially when the games are played on a Sunday afternoon. It is not the boom, bang, crash of Twenty/20. It is more like 50 over cricket with the most boring 20 overs of the game sliced off. I like it and I’m not alone.


Anyway, I was supposed to meet a friend by the pavilion which he took to mean sitting high in the temporary stand, so I watched the start from beside the sightscreen. We stuck them in, with ‘weather’ about and Finn and Murtagh opened up. Soon, Jordan (promoted to open but looking ill at ease) edged low to Ace who made no mistake and Walters was yorked without troubling the scorers.


My mate found me hereabouts and I watched the rest of the game from on high, a few seats away from a turkey or two. Suddenly, sensation! Brown, once of this parish, launched into our Timothy, hitting 6 4 4 6. The ground is pretty small but even so. Shaggy indicated to Hendo that he was needed to replace Murts. However, Berg replaced Finn and got some lift with his first ball which flew to Compo, accounting for Afzaal, who’d used up all his luck against us in the Twenty/20. So Shaggy decided that he’d let Tim stay on to bowl at his little brother.


It was here that we witnessed a piece of dreadful dissent because Henderson, having warmed up vigorously, was so disgusted by Shaggy’s change of mind that he hurled his cap to the ground/Hendo threw his cap to the ground in mock outrage** [**delete which version seems to you the most unlikely].


It proved a fine decision. Little Chris clearly knew that bigger brothers rule in the back garden, over the park, in the side streets and at Guildford Cricket Club because he obediently left the ball alone to bang into his off stump. The lower middle order did a reasonable job of building a partial recovery but Shaggy, in particular, got wickets before any serious damage could be done and a total of 213 did not seem enough.


Except that we are talking about the Middlesex batting here.


But, no need to have worried, Malan was into fluent mode at once and was striking balls square on both sides of the wicket. This was great to see. Compo was a little more sluggish at first but he, too, was soon picking up the runs at will. We were even treated to the ‘falling away-over the shoulder shot’ from a free hit. Jordan, who opened the bowling as well as the batting, was treated particularly severely. Has he decided whether he’s West Indian or English yet? On today’s evidence, no one cares.


Essentially, we were always ahead of the DL rate (and we had the odd shower or two, so this was more than academic) and even when Malan departed run out we were never in danger. Ace, appearing at 3 rather than Sam Robson (a slight pity as it turned out) hit a fifty from around 35 balls – and this after a careful start (I reckon he had only scored a single from his first 7 or 8 balls, so he advanced to 50 from roughly the next 28 deliveries). He slog-swept one six and smashed another pretty straight. The latter was off Schofield whose vociferous appealing rather annoyed me but who, at least, looked as though he was competing.


100+ for the first wicket; 217 for 1 when we passed their total; five overs in hand. It is always good to beat Surrey and it is even better to stuff them completely. But, as some Surrey members were saying at the end, they ought to be ashamed of themselves. They never turned up and it was rather a pity for such a large crowd who deserved better.

 

Phillip Hughes, Middlesex

 Boy Dun Not So Good  @ Lord's/ Surplus To Requirements @ Guildford

 


This is a crazy season, fixture-wise. Because so little cricket has been available at home at weekends, I’ve now seen precisely the same amount of away games as I have at home. And I’m off to Derby this week.

Murtagh Most Foul
Posted by: Middlesex till we die (IP Logged)
Date: 19/07/2009 23:00

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:07:23:07:20:59 by Ged.

Re: Murtagh Most Foul
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 20/07/2009 20:28

Enjoyable reading thanks Dingy. Concur with your opinion about 40/40 format totally.

Was hoping to go myself but another commitment prevented me. I know a lot of our Mafia, Generals and Turkeys had earmarked this as a must go to match. Out of large crowd what was our following Dingy? Also what about the atmosphere as from previous visits found ground souless

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Re: Murtagh Most Foul
Posted by: rod/ed (IP Logged)
Date: 20/07/2009 20:52

In a rare visit south I attended this match, and also enjoyed the report. There was a full crowd but any atmosphere was probably lost by the home sides poor showing and also by the strong cold wind blowing accross the ground. A good win complemented by a couple of decent real ales from the beer tent!

Re: Murtagh Most Foul
Posted by: dingy bags (IP Logged)
Date: 20/07/2009 21:06

Middx well represented Kev - many in the pink that I did not recognise. Perhaps we have a few fans south of the capital who rarely make it north.

Atmosphere wasn't bad but, as above, Surrey fans had little to crow about.

Guildford did a good job - there was a snack tent with food largely home-made (and pretty good value I was told) and proper beer on gravity in the beer tent. All of this run by club members, it seemed. And they had a good crowd in with two major attraction on tele and a cool, iffy day to boot. (I drove through a prolonged shower on the way home.)

All you could want from an outground - Uxbridge and Southgate please note.

Re: Murtagh Most Foul
Posted by: Seaxe_Man (IP Logged)
Date: 20/07/2009 21:39

For the first time this year, we excelled in all the three disciplines and looked in control throughout. The fielding was particularly pleasing given the small playing area. BTW DB, The Torygraph reported the crowd as circa 3,000. Probably about right. They do have a significant hospitality area, which gives a fuller feeling. They (Surrey) on the other hand, have studied the place for many years, granting regular matches and building up their clientele.(presumably not describing it as an away ground) Not like the half hearted support that our out matches have received over the years, from the 'hierarchy'!

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net