Dial M for Complete Carnage
5fer + more carnage
By Dingy Bags
June 19 2011
Dingy Bags reports on what can only be described as a Crazy Day 1 of " coventional" County cricket. Who needs 20/20. Read on...
CRAZY CRICKET
God
knows what would happen if either of these two sets of batsmen had to
bat on uncovered wickets or, perhaps more relevantly, had to face
Division 1 bowling.
Joe
Denly, on the boundary around the time we were seven or eight down,
said the wicket was green and damp and nipping around a bit. It was
hardly a minefield but twenty three wickets fell at Lords on the first
day of a notionally four day match. Your reporter called out to umpire
Nigel Llong, “Are you going to report the pitch?” He only stared, so I
added, at once, “Or the batting?” He nodded vigorously, grinning, and
added that he fancied a day off. He’ll probably get two, even with a few
hours of rain.
In
Kent’s first innings, all three of our bowlers were on a hat trick and
Key made it a fourth golden duck in the second innings. I’m not sure how
often either has happened before. Of course, given the events of last
night, we were all joking that we didn’t want to get Kent at 21-6, or we
would lose. Well, we had them 22-6 today and we still might lose.
Essentially, Colly and Murts were consistent and probing and Finn was
quick and accurate. Denly looked all at sea but Key went first and next
ball Robson took a good diving catch to remove Northeast, who later had
the chance to register a king pair on one day. Van Jaarsveld, so often
our tormentor, was caught at short leg off Finn and Stevens well held by
Simmo next ball. When Murts appeared, at first change for once, he had
Denly and Goodman in no time. No one thought the match was won.
At
22-6, the skipper dropped Jones in the slips off Finn. We could,
honestly, have had them out for less than 50 – and it might still prove
crucial. Just to rub it in, he top-edged a hook for six next ball. In
fact Jones and Mahmood more than doubled the score before Malan held a
slip catch off Murts and so Jones went just before an early lunch. Which
was also a late lunch given the late start. In fact, given that the
umpires had a look for ten minutes before calling for lunch, the overs
were added on to the end of the day which came some time after eight
o’clock. At one point, only half-joking, Lower Pav reckoned we might ask
for the extra half-hour!
Anyway,
Murts made short work of the tail and Colly took the last wicket.
Murts, 5-27. What followed was a brief spell of play that bore some
resemblance to first-class cricket. With application and, yes, some
luck, Newman and Robson put on 54 runs, ie within 33 of the Kent total.
Shaw then seemed to york Newman, Mahmood was recalled and seven wickets
fell for 51 runs. No one in the middle order was able to find the grit
to tough out an ugly 30/40 that would have taken us well clear. Housego
tried, but edged into the slips, but the 20/20 shots played by Malan and
Simmo, to be caught on the edge of the square, were not pretty viewing.
Others, Dexter, Dalrymple, Crook, scratched around for a bit and Murts,
getting off the mark from the twenty-first ball he faced with a
majestic straight four, was caught next ball. In fact, only an entirely
sensible stand of 29 from the last pair, Finn playing some lovely,
authentic shots, took us to any real sort of lead at all.
The
impending tube strike meant that I had to leave with five overs to go,
or face the possibility of being stranded somewhere short of home, but
this was time enough for the Key golden and for Northeast, having
avoided the king pair, to top edge a hook off Finn that went miles into
the air towards long leg. Middlesex would have chosen all ten of the
other fieldsmen to catch the ball ahead of the occupant of that
position, given the option, but to his credit Colly held it stomach high
and then held the pose as if he was convinced that the ball might still
pop out. 10-2.
Not
a good time to leave but needs must. I see we got a third wicket before
the late, late close but we could still easily lose this game. I am
reminded of the game at Derby in some ways, when we should have got a
bigger lead. Denly didn’t sound too confident but he seems to have got a
few second time around. The question is, how many can we chase?
Kev
wore a T-shirt today that said “You Muppet!”. It could have referred to
virtually any of the batsmen on view. JC reckons that it is the
influence of 20/20 cricket but then, he would!
Not
sure what the weather’s going to do from here but it cannot prevent a
result in this game now. However, if you are going tomorrow, you will
see some tense cricket, before the rain. One batsman on either side
could win this game. It’s just a pity none of ours could take the chance
in the first innings but, then, when was supporting this side ever an
easy ride?
Dingy Bags
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011:06:23:00:33:27 by BarmierKev.
From what you and others have said, there were a number of poor shots played - described by some as T20 shots.
It certainly appears that the players seem to have real trouble adjusting their game from one format to another – in this case within the space of just 15 hours……
A great report, well done indeed..I do not know how you manage to write down and remember all the details of such a hectic day.I do not think I could do it.
I have already posted my thoughts on this truly remarkable day on the other thread.
What is going to happen? I really have not got a clue, other than as it is Middlesex I am sure there will be plenty of twists and turns before the outcome is known.
DB, a great report! Many thanks!!
What a crazy day!!
A good match though and yes we didn't bat so well, but our bowlers made up for it!!!
I can't get to Lords today (working boo!!) wish I could!!
Kimmy
Middlesex players playing v Kent at Lord's:
To have played in all seven of their Twenty20 matches this season: 4
To not be a Twenty20 ever-present, but to have played at Canterbury the previous evening: 2
To have played Twenty20 cricket this season, but to have not played at Canterbury: 2
To have not played Twenty20 cricket this season: 3
Kent players playing v Middlesex at Lord's:
To have played in all five of their Twenty20 matches this season: 5
To not be a Twenty20 ever-present, but to have played at Canterbury the previous evening: 2
To have played Twenty20 cricket this season, but to have not played at Canterbury: 2
To have not played Twenty20 cricket this season: 2
I do lament the lack of spine batsmen, no doubt overly spoilt on a diet of easy batting tracks and rules that suit them, that will fold up like a pack of cards as soon as it starts moving about a bit...
That, and a propensity of modern day coaching that extolls the 'play your natural game' as the be all approach to the game. Hence you will always see lame effort dismissals as these kids bravely try to maintain the ‘run rate’ as if their very lives depended on it. This arficial construct is of no importance whatsoever on day’s such as this and had our middle order gutsed the day out to be 150/5 instead of all out would be lauded for their efforts. Instead we have to hope that our lads will have the wherewithal to reach the target, whatever that may be.
Kudos though to Sam Robson who must have shown some endeavour to get 40.
luckily they never sent Jonathan Liew, who no doubt would have gone into rapsodies re the batting.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011:06:20:21:45:05 by dingy bags.
