Bores draw nore criticism


Yaaaaawn.
By Harvey
August 5 2012

The ever cheerful Harvey finds some positives in the days play but many shortcomings,including his railway timekeeping. Thanks for the report Harvey.

Middlesex v Warwickshire (Day 4) Uxbridge 2012

 

Middlesex's positive batting display yesterday afternoon had left the game in a situation where any result was possible. However a not exactly brilliant weather forecast combined with Warwickshire's negative tactics employed from very early on in the game suggested a result would be difficult to force. It was therefore with modest expectations that I set off from Bristol. Leaving the house too late to get the train, my only option was to drive.

 

I passed through some really horrible weather en route from Bristol, but despite the fact it was raining heavily just half a mile away, all was dry at the ground itself. I took my place at Vermin Corner 20 minutes before the scheduled start, and 5 minutes later my friend Tom arrived. I had arranged to meet up with him at the cricket a couple of times this season, but on both occasions the weather had ruined our plans. Right on cue the rain started and we retreated to the clubhouse.

 

The rain was enough to wash out the first session, but after some more excellent work by the groundstaff, play was able to commence at 1345, leaving 63 overs to be played. Middlesex began on 104/3 (a lead of 182), with Dex on 45 and  Morgan on 7. Yesterday's positive approach continued, but lost wickets meant the ferocious assault that would have been necessary to really put Warwickshire under presssure wasn't able to get going. Morgan fell, caught behind by Ambrose off Wright without adding to his overnight score.

 

After Dex completed a fine half century, Simmo (18) departed in the quest for quick runs, caught by Rankin off Wright at deep square leg.

 

Dex greeted Patel's introduction into the attack with a 6 over cow corner, but that was as good as it got for the day. The Ice Man (1) tried something similar but could only sky one to Rankin at mid wicket.

 

The declaration finally came on 178/6 with Dex undefeated on 84 and Ollie on 14. This left Warwickshire a target of 260 off 40 overs. A very big ask, certainly, but we did fleetingly wonder whether something might have been contrived between the captains.

 

We should have known better. The Warwickshire Bores made it very obvious that they had no intention whatsoever of even making a fleeting effort to go for the win. One unnamed source suggested that maybe Warwickshire were looking for a sponsorship deal with Nytol.

 

In 40 overs it was never going to be possible on that pitch to dismiss a team intent only on self-preservation, and Porterfield (23) was the only wicket to fall, top-edging an attempted cut off Ollie, with The Ice Man taking the catch. After a tedious final session, the captains put us out of our misery by shaking hands with Warwickshire on 78/1 with 13 overs still remaining.

 

It's a fact of life that bore draws happen from time to time in four day cricket. Sometimes it's down to the weather, sometimes a flat pitch. Sadly in this instance it was down to a visiting team that from the time they came out to bat in their 1st innings on Day 2 (after having won the toss don't forget) made no visible attempt to play for anything other than a draw. If this is in any way indicative of their usual approach, then it's to be hoped that their stay at the top of the County Championship table will be a short one.

 

Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: Middlesex till we die (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 08:01

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012:08:06:19:33:40 by The Diamond ruled ok.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: Seaxe_Man (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 10:17

A pretty accurate summary of events BH.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: lower pavilion (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 11:08

Harvey.

A good report. In any game it takes two to tango. In this instance only Middlesex wanted to get on the dance floor.

Warwickshire may well win the championship but if this how they do it I am not particularly impressed.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: adelaide (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 14:56

The gist of the BBC website report was that Warwickshire had gone back to the top despite having to settle for a draw.

Was there any point after the first hour when they would not have been happy to settle for a draw?


Adelaide

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: kimmy (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 22:55

Apparently a certain coach from the bores complained about the comments and chanting coming from vc ..... Oh well....

Kimmy

Always look on the bright side of life... de dum de dum de dum de dum dum

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 05/08/2012 23:44

Kimmy that has really cheered me up. Do they expect us to admire this style of play that would undoubtedly deter many from supporting 4 day cricket.

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: Jonathan Winsky (IP Logged)
Date: 06/08/2012 09:37

I have found Ashley Giles and his parents to be nice people, as his parents were sitting next to Lower Mound and I on Friday, and he went to see them that afternoon. When Giles was with his parents, Lower Mound asked him to sign a couple of things and asked him a couple of questions, and he was very obliging. Admittedly, he initially said "no" to the request of signing, but he said it as a joke! He then said "of course I will".

I thought Giles would be a difficult person to get along with, what with his eight years as an England cricketer and his grey hair, but he proved us wrong.

It was just a shame his team were so negative. Despite that, I look forward to Middlesex playing Warwickshire in the County Championship division one in 2013. Maybe if we meet them earlier in the season, their tactics might be more positive. Sadly we have to put up with them for four more days in 2012, starting in a fortnight at Edgbaston.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: Primrose Hillbilly (IP Logged)
Date: 06/08/2012 10:25

Hmmmmmmmmm ............... given the obvious enthusiasm with which everyone - players and supporters - from the Mighty Middle went for the win, and the negative approach of the oppo, would there have been anything to be gained by Buck NOT shaking hands and agreeing the draw?

He could say that he was going for the win, it would only take 9 more good balls to achieve this, and once this has been achieved, you can then pack off back to Brum.

What would Brearley have done? (Put himslef on to bowl donkeydrops, probably!)

The paying public were deprived of seeing quite a few overs because of this agreed draw.

At the risk of sounding boring, cricket needs to remember that it is part of the entertainment industry, and those that came to watch thsi game had some very good alternative sporting entertainment on offer the otehr side of London or on TV.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: lower pavilion (IP Logged)
Date: 06/08/2012 18:19

I think that was a Brearley type declaration.The great man would, if memory serves me right, try and give a target that would tempt the opposition.

However I was at this game for all 4 days and trust me nothing would have tempted Warwickshire.

If memory serves me right the target was 260 off 40 overs. A tough but by no means impossible target. Why did they not have a go for say 10 overs and they could then always have defended afterwards. However they never even remotely seemed to be interested in getting the runs.

I have no idea whether this is how they approach the majority of their games. However with so many other forms of entertainment available these days, if this approach ever became the norm, then 4 day cricket would be in very big trouble.

I must also add once again that I applaud the way Middlesex approached and played this game.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:08:06:18:21:47 by lower pavilion.

Re: Bores draw more criticism
Posted by: Fozzie (IP Logged)
Date: 06/08/2012 22:20

After 20 overs in their 2nd innings Warks's run rate had actually reached the dizzy heights of over 3.5, but clearly this gave them a nose bleed and they pulled back to finish on 2.88 - still heady stuff compared with their 1st innings.

JW - I'm rather distressed that you associate grey hair with being difficult. Puts a number of us at a disadvantage...

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net