Howell the Helm did we lose that!


An eventful over
By Barmy Kev
May 1 2017

Barmy Kev reports on a very confused scoreboard and a match we managed to claw round  to our advantage and somehow lose.   

I’m on the way to Lord’s still feeling miffed about the previous two home games where we should have won, but ended up as disappointing draws.

I arrive at Lord's just over an hour late.  Glaws team are dressed like Wasps. The scoreboard shows us 96-3 from one over.    That was an eventful over.  It was soon 96-5 from 20 as Norwell achieves a Michelle. All’s not well at all as Benny Howell shows Higgo the door 115 -6. TRJ takes 14 balls to get off of the mark, but this consolidation proved valuable as he starts to accelerate.    A 100+ put on with Voges and we are perhaps looking at 270 score. They are both out in quick succession. Helm is struggling to get bat on ball and Benny Howell bamboozles him. A late cameo between Hi Fi and Ravi takes us over 250 mark with some brutal hitting from the Watford Wall including 6 off last ball. Although the scoreboard credited this to Ravi. Easy to confuse these two.  Our score looked competitive and could have been much worse.

In reply, Helm was proving to be economical and Finn expensive carrying from where we left off Thursday.  Once the opening partnership broken Glaws were struggling.     Wickets falling runs drying up Glaws are 66-5 from 22 overs.  Helm’s 7 overs were for 13. Ravi looked unplayable as he was mixing up his variation of spin.  Meanwhile Shots was doing a streak in the Long Room.  Cockbain and Benny Howell were struggling to push on and Glaws were 100+ plus and halfway behind the Vera.  I was talking about how crucial this was for our goal difference and this kind of makes up for previous disappointments.

So what went wrong? There was an over from Ravi that they hit the first boundary off of him, which was followed by a scampered single that went for 4 overthrows. This gave them some momentum. When run rate required was 10+ there were two successive sixes off of previously economical Higgins.     There were able to score singles regularly with an obligatory boundary per over. Helm came back and was being punished.  Franco had a very expensive penultimate over.  5 needed of the last over trusted to Higgins to take pace off. That worked well a six off the first ball and it was game over.

While, it was disappointing I have to say that was an entertaining game with many twists and turns.  Full credit to Howell and Cockbain for a well-judged run chase.  To be honest I was in a worse mood after Essex and Sussex farces. Meanwhile,  there were many positives which we can take and feel we can be competitive in this form. Here's to our first win soon.       

Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: Middlesex till we die (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 10:10

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017:05:02:14:35:02 by BarmierKev.

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: freddie tittlemouse (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 11:13

Surely time for Helm to be in the 4 day side ahead of Finn and Murtagh?

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: chunkyinargyll (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 11:57

I do wonder if Tom's emergence might be the beginning of the end for Murts. A bit of squad rotation can cover that up for a while- but where does that leave James Harris?

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 12:36

Helm bowled a superb opening spell. Hindsight is a wonderful thing , but perhaps we should have bowled him right through.

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: Seaxe_Man (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 12:37

Accurate report of proceedings. Norwell set it up with a superb spell from the Pavilion. Bowled straight through with a wicket with his final delivery..

Doubtless the pitch flattened a touch but we were unable to match that.

Ravi bowled well and spun the ball on a number of occasions claiming one stumping.

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: adelaide (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 12:44

This sort of defeat seems to hit us too often, irrespective of who is bowling at the end. The fact that it hit Surrey even bigger time last week is no comfort. Best way of winning is to keep taking wickets.

The advent of T20 has also changed attitudes on what is achievable in the last few overs and that in turn probably means batsmen are less scared to consolidate in that position. We used to win matches through Edmonds and Emburey strangling teams mid innings and usually getting some wickets as a result of the pressure. I wonder how that would work now?


Adelaide

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: BeefyRoberts (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 13:01

Spot on report Kev.
Gloucestershire......how can we beat them?
Always a pain the the rear!!

Must admit,although we got beat,it was a good game ebbing to and fro.
Helm bowled well,and a very exciting prospect.
Toby our all-rounder and welcome back to Voges as well.
With Gloucs 65-5 I thought we had the game until Cockbain and Howell got settled.

Oh well,forward we go.

Re: Howell the Helm did we lose that!
Posted by: BarmierKev (IP Logged)
Date: 01/05/2017 18:58

Please note the scoreboard on the headline. At the time I thought it was a Dernbach over

Barmy Kev
I'm only here for the tele

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net