It's all about culture
Change is coming
By London Leprechaun
September 30 2019
Our final report of the season is about the forum which was not just a cut and paste from last year. It is not a verbatim report of the forum so if anyone else who was there feels anthing is missed please add your pennyworth.
It was reasonably attended given the weather, timing and transport problems. Fair number of empty seats though.
Started with the player news now up on the web site but just to recap:
Malan resigns captaincy role
Cummins signs 3 year deal
Sowter extends contract
Rayner leaves Middlesex
Barber leaves Middlesex
None of the website quotes were repeated tonight and there was nothing to suggest during the evening that Malan is leaving. But the question was not directly asked; Cummings signing is apparently, potential cover for TRJ and Helm still on the England radar.
Stuart Law talked about other changes next year which he described as cultural. For example
- Negative comments when batsman is out. Coming in saying its swinging all over the place; So and so is bowling xxxxx fast. Puts next batsmen off anyway that’s what you expect bowlers to do.
- It’s the club’s fault when not playing for England
- I’ve always done it this way when asked to look at changing something in your game
- It’s the pitches fault
- Need senior players to step us a leadership group to drive culture changes and call out this kind of talk. Language is important.
However, it is also felt the batting group need someone who can coach batsman on the field as well as be good influence of, so the overseas player next year likely to be a batsman. We are in discussion with some now. Stuart Law tried to see if AB was interested for a full season but no luck in that. No decision on whether the overseas player would also be captain but not being ruled out.
Other points in no particular order
- Murtagh will put Middlesex ahead of playing for Ireland.
- All bowlers have been told to cut run ups to help over rate and to stop faffing about changing the field in-between overs.
- Every match matters – the Derbyshire match was not meaningless and the players were told that
- We will only sign other county players if they are going to be really significant contributors off the field; some of our signings have struggled with living in London. Denly and Ireland were examples of this.
- Remember if we sign someone we are denying a place to one of our players.
- On loss of players who’ve succeeded elsewhere. Gus view is that we have always been a County that over produces players from the Academy and it is inevitable some will go elsewhere. Some have struggled with competition at Middlesex and with living in London and want to go and be big fishes in smaller ponds where they will be guaranteed play.
- Stuart Law is excited by some of the even younger players who are coming through, and knew a fair bit about them.
- Will likely be more matches at Lord’s next year. MCC want us. Possibly six CC and even some Royal London games.
- There was no question about Barnet.
- Finances and sponsorship so far not affected by Div 2 status.
- Rumours about ECB cutting first class counties not founded. Richard said ECB are putting more investment into supporting the County game.
- No question on the Middlesex room.
And sadly as it was getting dark and we still had to run the gauntlet of MCC security there was no chance to see how much more of the Compton stand has been eaten.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019:10:14:22:39:12 by London Leprechaun.
I know it pretty much says so above, but I'll ask anyway - was it directly confirmed that Murtagh is staying?
Interesting that negative dressing room comments are now presented as coming from batsmen who are out rather than from those waiting to go in. I would have thought that comments about how the wicket is playing would be useful to the rest but there is a difference between a despairing comment and one that it is constructive - such as - he's swinging it late so think about batting out of your crease.
While cutting run ups sounds good, wasn't that one of the reasons why Finn lost form? It won't sort all bowlers. Less faffing about with the field during overs, never mind in between them - and get back to your mark quicker.
I'm not too keen about the comments on some signings being unable to cope with living in London. You are unlikely to know that in advance so it comes across as an excuse not to sign anyone. I note that it hasn't stopped Surrey signing players regularly, though arguably some of them have not reproduced their form from elsewhere.
As for wanting to be a big fish in a small pond, we're looking like a pretty small puddle at the moment.
All in all, it leaves me unconvinced that the hierarchy has properly come to terms with the huge increase in mobility in the game.
TRJ and Helm on the England radar? Sounds like Kevin Hand drafted that bit.
Adelaide
Play for teams like Somerset Derbyshire, Kent (in fact anywhere else) and I expect the first thing a new player does is buy a flat or house within 5 miles of the ground. They can then get to work in 10 minutes, and a nice easy meeting point if the club arrange a coach to travel to an away game (to save stress and driver tiredness if it is an important T20 match the day after a home game)
Our players seem to be strung out all over the place. Some living in the country (Bucks) whilst Chiswick and Barnet might both be in 'Middlesex' but try driving from one to the other in the rush hour.
So- if you hire a coach (I know we don't normally) where do yo start from? Make everyone spend an hour or more getting to Lord's first, or say Uxbridge (easy access to M25 and M40).
The problem is you need to be a millionaire to buy a property in St John's Wood which must make player recruitment and retention harder than other counties.
It does look like,from the report,that Murts will still be gracing us with his presence next year.
More games at Lords....does that put any outgrounds at risk,as stated 50 over games could be at Lords as well?
Signing someone will deny a player his place?...called competition for places,healthy if used properly by the backroom staff!
And,finally,it looks like the Lawman is going to sort out the over rate,in sure the lesser spotted batting points will be sorted as well.
Thanks for an in depth report,sadly missed forum.
We wait to see who will enter our club now!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019:10:01:07:56:38 by Seaxe_man1.
What is a player supposed to do when he is out cheaply?
Go back to the dressing room, swear a lot, and throw his bat through the window?
Say nothing, and sit in the corner and sulk?
Say 'That was entirely my fault I'm a useless xxxx'
or 'The ball is swinging all over the place?'
Maybe it would help if he added 'but finding a way to get through these difficult passages of play is essential if I am to retain my place in the side and become a better player. I'm eager to learn. How do I stop this xxxx Robinson getting me out?'
As for cricketers unable to settle in London this is as pathetic as it gets. Millions of people have to commute and don't have the luxury of living in St John's Wood. Somebody tell Jo Denly that Kent isn't exactly the Hebrides. This reminds me of Emburey's excuses for not signing players that nobody could afford to live in London.
In some parts of the Uk you can buy a 3 bed house for 150k
You couldn't even get a garden shed for that in Greater London, and we know we are in the 'middle range' when it comes to what we can afford on players salaries.
S_M I know you are a Sowter fan, and he is good in white ball cricket. So far he has seen off both Patel and Rayner, so hopefully his red ball form will justify that faith.
Very valid points made re housing costs. Despite the salary caps for Middlesex and Surrey being in excess of the other 16 Counties, you won’t get much within Zone 4 for £600,000 (which would pay for a large detached house with garden in most other counties).
Wouldn’t have thought that many of the Middlesex squad are earning in excess of £100,000. You do the maths.
Players do have to make lifestyle choices.
Quote:freddie tittlemouse
Essex is not exactly the sticks and they seem to be coping quite well.
I suggest you search Zoopla and look at properties circa £600,000 in and around Chelmsford. No comparison.
Quote:freddie tittlemouse
The Times review of the season today stated that Middlesex should show contrition for their sorry performance. Sounds as if contrition was pretty thinly spread.
As for cricketers unable to settle in London this is as pathetic as it gets. Millions of people have to commute and don't have the luxury of living in St John's Wood. Somebody tell Jo Denly that Kent isn't exactly the Hebrides. This reminds me of Emburey's excuses for not signing players that nobody could afford to live in London.
The point made was that London can be a cold unfriendly place if you live a long way from the other players and do not meet socially. Those who play for say Somerset tend to live within 20 mins of the ground.
It may only be a small point but it does help team bonding and spirit.
Similarly about not coming back to the dressing room and not saying no one can play that. Its ok to say the umpire is blind but not other kinds of negativity especially when you have young players in the side.
Again a small point but one Law wants changed.
Quote:snickoQuote:freddie tittlemouse
Essex is not exactly the sticks and they seem to be coping quite well.
I suggest you search Zoopla and look at properties circa £600,000 in and around Chelmsford. No comparison.
They do not need to live in Central London! Has this all become a factor in the last 3 years and caused us to slide from 1st to 16th? Come off it.
Quote:freddie tittlemouse
The Times review of the season today stated that Middlesex should show contrition for their sorry performance. Sounds as if contrition was pretty thinly spread.
As for cricketers unable to settle in London this is as pathetic as it gets. Millions of people have to commute and don't have the luxury of living in St John's Wood. Somebody tell Jo Denly that Kent isn't exactly the Hebrides. This reminds me of Emburey's excuses for not signing players that nobody could afford to live in London.
Freddie
It isn't something you can just throw a switch on and then everything is OK. Some people are really unhappy in London despite expecting to like it. Others find that they love it despite expecting to loathe it. They didn't know that before they moved there, nor did their employers. In the worst cases it can lead to depression or other forms of mental stress (I've seen it). Telling anyone, cricketer or otherwise, to just "pull themselves together" is not the answer. If that person is able to move elsewhere to pursue their living and be happier, that is what they should do.
Of course that should not be used as an excuse not to think about signing players from elsewhere, which was part of the vibe I got form the forum report but youm do have to be preared for some to go pear-shaped.
Adelaide
Gus Fraser when asked at a Forum earlier this season why we gained so few batting points last season (2018) blamed er …. the pitches at Lords!!!
Good to see that the coach and director of cricket are on the same page(!)
NB Incidentally 11 of the 14 batting points gained in 2018 were at Lords with only 3pts gained away - proving Gus doesn't know what he is talking about as usual.....unless he thinks the pitches away from Lords were even worse. excuses, excuses, excuses
The other is the housing cost, which I do think is a genuine issue. In my working days before self-employment (or loafing around, as Mrs Seaxe calls it), those of us in my international company who lived and worked in London were paid greater allowances in recognition of the costs involved; I've no idea if Middlesex can afford to do that, but suspect not. I am also involved in a school in the south east (not London) and can guarantee that the cost of housing is a huge factor in getting very few applicants for jobs from people elsewhere in the country.
Cricketers are, I think, better paid than they used to be, but unless they are internationals, are not hugely wealthy. We shouldn't underestimate these factors when looking to recruit players.
Quote:Those 14 wickets at 46 were garnered at the back end of the season when spinning tracks apart from a couple of places aren't the norm. Certainly the Lord's track wasnt and neither was OT.snicko
Sowter played as our frontline spinner in Championship matches and returned 14 wickets at an average of 46 !
Very valid points made re housing costs. Despite the salary caps for Middlesex and Surrey being in excess of the other 16 Counties, you won’t get much within Zone 4 for £600,000 (which would pay for a large detached house with garden in most other counties).
Wouldn’t have thought that many of the Middlesex squad are earning in excess of £100,000. You do the maths.
Players do have to make lifestyle choices.
Quote:Seaxe_man1
Some interesting possibilities for our overseas player next year.
Ross Taylor fits the bill. Alan Coleman spoke highly of his attitude and influence off the park.
Sowter has been an utter revelation.
I must have drowsed through every single spell he has bowled. He neither threatens with monstrous spin,nor horrendous bounce, nor a range of deliveries that make him hard to pick. He just trundles in, goes for a few runs, then scurries round the outfield between overs.
When he takes a wicket, it comes as a bit of a surprise. It's never because he's put the batsman through an over of utterly bewildering "couldn't lay a bat on him", groping, humiliation, and then finished him off.
I have never even seen anyone else look up and start taking notice when he comes on. Sowter is the least charismatic leg spinner I have ever come across, and the most anonymous fielder. Who's that one? .........err, well, going round, Simmo, then Robbo and Mala in the slips, that's Toby, there's Gubbins, Helm's the tall one, Tim's the dark one................so that must be Sowter by process of elimination.
I have to believe that unless he develops some variations during the close season, "the word" that will have gone out round the circuit that he is pretty innocuous will become completely justified next season - at our expense.
My hope is that we once had quite a good leg spinner, but the captain would not bowl him enough. Now Dawid has stood down, maybe we will get more overs out of him.
OMFG...........Titmus, Edmonds, Emburey, Tufnell, Weekes, Peploe even ........
To me Sowter still looks like a one day spinner and he hasn't really taken what opportunities there were in the CC, though come to think of it not many spinners have taken wickets against us either (perhaps because we are 35-6 too often). His batting has made things happen more frequently than his bowling. He is surely one of the best fielders in the team, anonymous or otherwise.
Reading between the lines, Sowter as main spinner says to me that we will quite often not be playing a spinner at all next year, a depressing thought. Malan (if still here) is surely not up to bowling long spells.
I can think of less effective Middlsex leggies. Yogi Gowalkar and early Imran Tahir, for a start.
Now if we can get an overseas batsman who also bowls decent spin. Labuschagne? Williamson? (I almost wrote Stirling...).
Adelaide
There's definitely a breed of spinner who can take wickets in white ball cricket, when the batsmen have to attack, but can't do so in red ball cricket.
It was right he got a chance in the championship side and I hope he improves, but I don't think (so far) he has convinced people that he will be our first choice spinner for the next ten years.
Considerably more expensive than Rayner- both in terms of runs per over conceeded and wickets taken.
But unless we are planning to sign an established county spinner from somewhere it's going to be Sowter plus a couple of spinners in their first year (assuming we sign Walallawita and Holman)
As Ollie obviously didn't want to leave it might have been wise to hang on to him for a little longer.
Of course, if Mala goes (we all hope not), that frees up more cash.
Just as Sowter will have been looked at by others, I hope he will have similarly researched his subject when next he comes on to bowl, and has learned a bit.
From watching him, I suspect that Sowter just does not have that seriously "big ripped" turning leg spinner in his armoury that - once unsheathed - is in the batsman's mind every delivery thereafter. If you have that, it keeps the batsmen honest when playing every ball and other variation.
Quote:Good shout Rod. Or Faf du Plessis who is jacking in international cricket.rod/edQuote:Seaxe_man1
Some interesting possibilities for our overseas player next year.
Ross Taylor fits the bill. Alan Coleman spoke highly of his attitude and influence off the park.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019:10:03:12:59:55 by Seaxe_man1.
I've seen Rayner get the ball to turn in matches on Sky.
I think he might have self deprecatingly referred to himself as a slow bowler, but at this level it's often tiny fractions of spin that gets a batsman out, particularly if you have deliberately not made any attempt to get the previous three or four deliveries to spin. I think it's called subtlety.
What is unusual is you wouldn't normally let the senior player go until you were sure the junior player had overtaken him productivity wise, which is why Rayner is entitled to be a bit miffed.
Sowter is a bit like an enthusiastic young puppy dog, so I expect Law was impressed with the 'energy' he brings, rather than Rayner who comes across as your more laid back philosophical type of cricketer, so I suppose he was an easy target if Law wanted to wake everyone up.
