Just in case you need a Reminder - CC1 Warwickshire in July


By Farmer White et al
August 21 2024

As th CC1 returns this wek here is a look back to the win we had just befre it allwent white for  month or so.  Farmer will be back in the red ball spotlight for most of September if he gets the muse though we'll both be in Edgbaston this next weekend and hopefully the weather will stay away!!  Enjoy Day for just before Day 1

County Championship 2024. Division 1. Somerset v Warwickshire 30th June and 1st, 2nd and 3rd July. Taunton.

Somerset. T.A. Lammonby, A.R.I. Umeed, T. Kohler-Cadmore, T.B. Abell, T. Banton, J.E.K. Rew (w), K.L. Aldridge, C. Overton (c), M. Pretorius, M.J. Leach, J.T. Ball.

Warwickshire. R.M. Yates, A.L. Davies (w), W.M.H. Rhodes, S.R. Hain, D.R. Mousley, E.G. Barnard, J.G. Bethell, M.G.K. Burgess, C.R. Woakes, M.G. Booth, O.J. Hannon-Dalby.

Overnight – Warwickshire 412 and 281 for 8. Somerset 284. Warwickshire lead by 409.

Final day 3rd July – A stunning victory and the watcher on the Trescothick Pavilion terrace

With Somerset in sight of a stunning victory, but with nothing certain, one watcher in particular caught my eye. As he leaned intently and motionless on the safety bar of the Trescothick Pavilion terrace, high above the play, I wondered what was going through his mind. The tension in the ground was such that every ball was bowled in silence, every run applauded or cheered with most watchers as motionless and watching as intensely as the one on the terrace. No one moved from their seat or from where they stood. No one dared. One of the age-old superstitions of cricket saw to that. When a side is on the cusp of winning a tight match, their supporters do not move. It is the eleventh commandment.

As I took my seat at the start of the day, the questions of the evening before about whether and when Warwickshire might declare had been answered. They had declared before the start and set Somerset 410 to win in the day’s full allotment of a minimum of 96 overs. I doubt anyone around me seriously thought Somerset would win, although the hope floated tantalisingly in the air. For most of the match, runs had proved difficult to score and wickets had proved difficult to take unless the batting side was on the attack. Any rational calculation based on the evidence of the first three days, an average of 326 runs a day, 3.4 an over, with wickets falling at an average of just over nine a day, pointed towards Somerset attempting to bat for a draw. If they were to attempt to win, they would need to score at 4.2 runs an over.

Then, Somerset’s start focused the mind. Tom Kohler-Cadmore, in the opener’s spot for the second match in succession, drove at Chris Woakes three times in the first over with his usual mixture of heart stopping and heart lifting results. The first, he missed. The second he edged at catchable height past fourth slip for four, the third he drove through the on side to the Garner Gates for four more. In the second over, Andy Umeed twice drove Oliver Hannon-Dalby through the off side, the first for two, the second to the Brian Rose Gates for four. A maiden played out by Kohler-Cadmore to Woakes was followed by Umeed pulling Hannon-Dalby and driving him off the back foot through extra cover, both for four. There were boundaries in each of the next three overs, all driven as Warwickshire searched for movement with the new ball. Given the the history of the first three days, Somerset’s quick advance felt like a bubble waiting to burst. And burst it did. Umeed attempted to drive a shorter length ball from Hannon-Dalby, edged it and was caught by Burgess moving neatly to his right. Somerset 44 for 1. Umeed 30 from 26 balls. Runs still needed, 366 from 88 overs. But Somerset’s intent was now clear. An attempt on the target was at least to be explored. It had been a pulsating if foreshortened start from Umeed, his free-flowing drives in particular, which brought him generous applause as he left the field, but it had cost him his wicket, too early in the piece it felt.

Tom Lammonby was more circumspect but still looked for runs although he never looked secure. He soon passed Kohler-Cadmore who, after that opening over, had seen little of the strike, and when he did, scored mainly in singles. Lammonby did find the boundary, although once, against Woakes, the ball came off the inside edge and passed excruciatingly close to the stumps. Another boundary came from a top edged hook against Michael Booth which fell safe just short of the rope. With the keeper up, Lammonby played and missed too but also scored with those smooth guides which are one of the hallmarks of his batting. Somerset were still forcing the pace, if not at the rate of the opening partnership, but Lammonby’s narrow escapes laid bare the risk for all to see.

Another top edged hook from Lammonby, off Michael Booth, flew high towards the Trescothick Pavilion. It began to fall short. Just visible from my seat, running beneath the front row of heads, along the boundary from the covers store towards the sight screen came Ed Barnard, full pelt. Then a full-length dive, arms outstretched before the ball was clasped, brilliantly. Lammonby gone. The only consolation was the perfect view of a spectacular catch from almost vertically above. “Yes! You bears!” shouted one joyous Warwickshire supporter. Somerset 77 for 2. Lammonby 26. 333 still needed with 77 overs remaining. The required rate was just beginning to edge up, 4.3 runs an over compared to the original 4.2. Not much of a gap, but Somerset had lost two wickets in the process which again emphasised the size of their task. 

Tom Abell to the wicket. Abell is Somerset’s most flexible top order batter, able to defend or attack with equal proficiency. He is also outstanding at pacing an innings and reading a match situation. If ever Somerset needed an Abell innings it was now. Hearts missed a beat when, defending, he edged his first ball past the slips for four. A lofted on drive only just cleared midwicket to a gasp or two from around me but Somerset benefited from two more runs. From there to lunch, Abell and Kohler-Cadmore played with a disjointed mixture of attack and defence, responding to the bowling no doubt, but it gave the impression of neither attacking the target nor playing for a draw. Abell found the boundary twice with drives while Kohler-Cadmore hooked a four and lofted Jacob Bethell over long on straight into the back of the lower level of the Trescothick Pavilion. They played with less risk than Umeed or Lammonby had done, but as the players left the field for lunch with the score on 117 for 2, Somerset had scored at 3.9 runs an over and the required rate had risen to 4.4. Not much of a rise perhaps, and still within bounds, but with both wickets lost to attacking strokes, Somerset needed a substantial partnership, and some luck.

Half an hour after lunch, it seemed that Somerset might have settled for a draw. In eight overs, only 15 runs were scored with only a single boundary, a cut for four to Abell off Bethell. Three maidens in succession had been bowled at one point and the required run rate had risen to 4.8. Too slow it seemed. And yet, and yet, a doubt nagged, a doubt generated by hope. Hope born in the remembrance of another match, 15 years before. In 2009, Yorkshire had set Somerset 476 to win in 90 overs, 4.6 runs an over on the flattest imaginable pitch. Marcus Trescothick and Arul Suppiah had opened. They had begun with the sort of intensely measured care that Abell and Kohler-Cadmore were now displaying before gradually picking up the rate. In 2024, were Somerset, 117 runs to the good with eight wickets standing, trying to consolidate before launching an extended assault on the target? As Abell and Kohler-Cadmore worked through those eight overs, the feeling they generated was reminiscent of that generated at the start of that Trescothick-Suppiah partnership. Hope.

Hope generates tension and the tension was about to receive a double twist from Kohler-Cadmore. First, he broke the dearth of runs by driving Woakes straight back to the Lord Ian Botham Stand and then cutting him through backward point to the Ondaatje boundary. Then, emphasising the risk that had been experienced on this pitch when attacking, he drove at Hannon-Dalby, miscued and the ball steepled wide of mid-on from where Barnard ran to take another good catch, this time from over his left shoulder. Somerset 144 for 3. Kohler-Cadmore 49, accumulated in over two and a half hours. The remaining target was 266 in 56 overs. Still 4.8 an over needed. Somerset really would need a partnership of substance, but Kohler-Cadmore and Abell had taken them 67 runs closer and the hope, even if threatened by that wicket, still held.

Tom Banton, who had made the number five slot in the Championship his own in the first half of 2024, joined Abell. Again, Somerset consolidated, 23 runs coming in the first ten overs of the partnership with only a single boundary, four clipped off his legs off Hannon-Dalby by Banton. After those ten overs, Somerset had reached 167 for 3, needing 243 in 46 overs, but as the overs remaining reduced the required rate rose faster. It was now 5.7 an over, but crucially Abell and Banton were still there with, a thick edge from Banton apart, little sign of threat from the bowlers, the softening ball perhaps reducing their effectiveness. The intent with which the pair batted, no opportunity for a single was missed, the slow scoring notwithstanding, continued to drive the tension as the target inched closer.

Now, they began to drive the scoring rate up. Boundaries began to be struck. Abell began with an on drive off Hannon-Dalby to the Hildreth Stand to register his fifty in nearly two hours. Off Barnard, he edged a cut through third slip, but with Warwickshire having to commit more to defence, there was no third slip. A straight drive from Banton off Robert Yates was struck with real intent and brought the standard accolade for a good stroke of, “Shot!” As tea approached singles began to reap applause, the crowd adding its encouragement. When Banton attempted to hook Booth, he top-edged the ball to the Lord Ian Botham Stand for four. When he attempted and missed an uppercut off the next ball someone in the crowd added stricture to encouragement with an anxious shout of, “Hey, cut it out!”  The tension was now gripping every nerve.

Booth was now pitching short, and accurately short, in an attempt to slow the scoring or force the batter into risk if he attacked. Virtually every ball went through at the batters upper body level. In response, Abell pulled him to the Priory Bridge Road Stand for four while Banton pulled him between the long and fine leg fielders for six, 12 runs coming from the over. Booth persisted and Banton hooked and top edged straight back over his head for the second time to the Lord Ian Botham Stand for four. The cheers were coming now for the boundaries, whether off the middle or the edge, for it was clear Somerset were not only intent on winning the match, but that they might just do it. In the over before tea, Banton turned Bethell behind square for a single to register his fifty from 76 balls in 81 minutes. Risks he had taken and some luck he had had, but at tea the target had been reduced to 180 from 33 overs, 5.5 an over. Somerset were now scoring at the required rate, at times exceeding it, and Abell and Banton were applauded off.

After tea, they continued as if there had been no break, no post-lunch style regrouping now. They did not quite maintain the required rate, but the boundaries still came, mainly from pulls, although Banton glanced Bethell and lofted him straight back over his head for six to the Trescothick Pavilion. In response, Warwickshire placed four on the boundary including a long leg and deep square leg, and to Banton, two shortish midwickets. Eventually, Banton pulled Barnard once too often and was caught by one of the midwickets falling to his right. Banton was visibly devastated. Somerset 282 for 4. Banton 81 in a minute over two hours and the applause followed him all the way to the Pavilion. Target now 130 in 22 overs. Required rate still 5.5 an over.

In 2009, at the fall of the second wicket, Somerset had sent in the tall pace bowler, David Stiff, to boost the scoring rate after the foundation had been laid. He scored 49 from 32 balls including four sixes, mainly targeting the roof of the Lord Ian Botham Stand as I recall. In 2024, with four wickets down, Migael Pretorius was sent in on a similar mission. His 14 runs from 10 balls did not take Somerset much closer but the required rate was maintained and at 282 for 5 Somerset needed 128 from three balls over 23 overs, still 5.5 an over.

In 2009, with Somerset needing 138 from 20 overs at the fall of the fifth wicket, Peter Trego marched out, there is no other way to describe Trego’s walk to the wicket. He proceeded to play the innings of his life, 103 not out from 54 balls in 68 minutes and Somerset won by four wickets with four and a half overs to spare. In fact, it may have been much closer than that, for as Zander de Bruyn struck the winning boundary through straight midwicket rain was beginning to fall heavily from clouds that had threatened for a while. In 2024, it was James Rew who walked to the wicket to join Abell with no Lewis Gregory to follow. Rew had had an annus mirabilis in 2023. In 2024 he had had, with the bat, a season not far short of what the late Queen called an annus horribilis. On the shoulders of Rew and Abell might depend the outcome of the match.

What followed was a partnership of dreams. As if to continue the theme of 2009, as Rew came to the wicket the sky was darkening, perhaps not yet threatening, but glowering enough to add a doubt about the weather to the tension. Rew announced himself with a drive through mid-off off Rhodes. It came resoundingly off the middle of the bat and crossed the rope in front of the covers store. ‘Resounding’ was a word which would exemplify Rew’s driving from which most of his boundaries came in this innings. Almost unnoticed in the tension, Abell had been approaching his century. He reached it with a single off Barnard in 12 minutes short of four hours. An over later, Rew slog swept Bethell for four and drove him straight back over his head to the Trescothick Pavilion for six, 14 coming from the over. That reduced the target to 85 from 16 overs, 5.3 runs an over.

Suddenly it felt like Somerset were favourites. To the detached observer it had probably felt like that for a while, but to the hardened supporter doubt keeps its grip for far longer. To the hardened supporter something akin to the Boycott doctrine applies, and if two wickets were added to Somerset’s score, the balance would shift markedly. Four hundred and ten was a huge target too, only once passed in Somerset’s history, in that match in 2009. The size of the target and the rarity of targets of that size being achieved brought pressures of their own. But, on Abell and Rew went, Abell pulling and cutting the off spin of Dan Mousley for four and Rew lofting Barnard over mid-on to the Colin Atkinson Pavilion boundary. Every boundary was now being cheered and every single applauded. The fifty partnership was reached when Abell turned Woakes to deep midwicket for a single with the target reduced to 61 in 12 overs, five runs an over. With five wickets standing, overs were no longer an issue. If Warwickshire were to win or save the match they would need to take wickets, perhaps all five.

And yet, tension still gripped. The crowd were hunched forward in their seats, faces taut, silent as each ball was bowled and the watcher at the terrace rail leaned on it, deep in thought, as motionless as the crowd, eyes fixed intently on the cricket. As the target fell past fifty only one boundary came in four overs, but still 22 runs came as Rew and Abell pushed easy singles or scampered quick ones to applause. Warwickshire’s last real hope, the ever-persistent Hannon-Dalby, was bowling now but the situation was beyond even his powers. Rew struck him as cleanly as a lofted drive can be struck back to the Trescothick Pavilion for four. Two balls later a rare full toss was driven spectacularly through the covers for four more and Rew had reached fifty from 49 balls. It had been so emphatic, so unexpected an innings given his form earlier in the season, so perfect for Somerset’s needs when he walked to the wicket, that some stood in applause, a rare accolade for a fifty in a Championship match. Not only had it met Somerset’s need of the moment, it had been a fifty of immense class in its own right.

While Rew was making his mark, Abell continued to make his at the other end. While Rew had made 50 he had made 31 of his own, quietly adding to the pressure applied by Rew. Now came a quieter over from Woakes, but even so five singles were taken, every one applauded to the echo. Somerset now needed 17. That six overs remained was irrelevant. Even more irrelevant when, from the first four balls of the next over from Booth, Abell drove, pulled, drove again and hooked for four, four, six and six, the last of which I lost sight of as it flew towards the region where the Priory Bridge Road Stand and the Caddick Pavilion meet. The final six took Abell past 150 and to his highest first-class score. I doubt anyone noticed the landmarks for Somerset had just won by five wickets and the crowd erupted.

All who could, stood as one, applauding with arms stretched high above their heads. At 410, it was Somerset’s second highest successful Championship run chase. I was lucky enough to have been present at the first and the third highest too. The highest in 2009, was also at Taunton. The third highest was at Hove in 2012. On that occasion when Somerset, chasing 396, lost their fifth wicket with 165 runs still needed and a long tail, things looked bleak as Peter Trego marched to the wicket to join James Hildreth. In the event, Somerset won by five wickets with Trego on 89 at the end. It had been another day of high tension, constant drama and an astonishing Somerset victory after which a small group of us stood at the entrance to the ground to applaud the team coach as it left. By now, the man who had leaned so intently on the safety rail towards the end of the match had retreated with what thoughts of his exploits in 2009 and 2012 I know not.

Result. Warwickshire 412 (M.G.K. Burgess, E.G. Barnard 92, W.M.H. Rhodes 63, M. Pretorius 5-104) and 281 for 8 dec (J.G. Bethell 66, R.M. Yates 57, A.L. Davis 50, C. Overton 4-57, M.J. Leach 3-97). Somerset 284 (T. Banton 78, T.B. Abell 61, O.J. Hannon-Dalby 6-56, M.G. Booth 3-68) and 413 for 5 (T.B. Abell 152*, T. Banton 81, J.E.K. Rew 57*). Somerset won by five wickets. Somerset 20 points. Warwickshire 7 points.

You can ead more of Farmer's stuff on his own website by clicking here

Just in case you need a Reminder - CC1 Warwickshire in July
Posted by: Grockles.com (IP Logged)
Date: 21/08/2024 10:55

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:08:27:07:41:38 by Grockle.

Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 29/06/2024 19:38

Lewis Gregory returns to captain Somerset against Warwickshire at Taunton tomorrow - the last county championship match for seven-and-a-half weeks at the height of summer and the school holidays. Shoaib Bashir also returns to this 14-man squad: Gregory (c), Lammonby, Abell, Banton, Kohler-Cadmore, Umeed. Rew, Overton, Pretorius, Aldridge, Davey, Leach, Ball, Bashir.

All-rounder Rob Yates is back for Warwickshire after illness, but left-arm spinner Danny Briggs is rested and replaced by Taunton-born and educated Jake Lintott.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:07:19:31:30 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 29/06/2024 21:47

Absolute insanity.

And I don't mean the squad.

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: hantssabre (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 08:56

And talk in the Sunday Times today that Bashir will be in the Test squad, not Jack!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 10:37

Yep Bash is out - off to England and Lewis won't be here so Craig is captain again. Somerset have won the toss and will field first'

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Shepton Paul 2 (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 10:37

They’re correct.

Bash preferred to Jack and Smith keeping wicket ahead of Foakes, despite what their counties think.

Durham’s Robinson should be in, but he doesn’t play for Surrey.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 10:42

The side is the Notts one with Josh Davey is for Jake Ball

Umeed, TKC, :Lammonby, Abell, Banton, Rew, Aldridge, Overton, Davey, Pretorius, Leach

The sun has even broken through and the sky is clearing.

(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:06:30:10:45:08 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 11:33

Josh getting some steepling bounce from the River end this morning. It seems there was a thought about playing two spinners today until Bash was called away. Jake Ball has been rotated Davey wasn't sure he was playing yesterday although they did put him through his paces every lunch break at Trent Bridge.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 11:37

Migael opening his account from the River end in what is presently his last game for us this summer

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:03

Over the last week one question keeps popping up... "Are we checking out if Migael is available for more of the season?"

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:13

Rules have changed on entry. Glass is still not allowed but decanting of cans has ceased. Moves in the right direction then?
The 4 can limit stays it seems.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:19

50 up for the Brummies in the 18th but with 4 wickets down

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:26

Decent start, especially from Pretorius.

Good to hear about the decanting change. Just need to get a couple more blocks of the Somerset stand open now.

And a couple more wickets before lunch please !

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:40

Where has Bash been called away to then?

Can't be England, surely, since Chris Woakes is also in the Test party - and the Warks team!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:43

Three sections still closed. Strange one tonight in that if you come to watch the footy you get a free drink for a fiver entrance fee. While a pint any other way is £6..... Taking into account that the game is on at 5pm entry after Tea is probably best by paying to see England leave the Euros.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 12:44

Yes Bash is 12th man fielding at the moment so we must have deffed out 2 spinners or not been able to play him in one of those wonderful ECB 'balanced' decisions.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 13:01

94 for 4 at lunch on Day 1

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 14:35

Well this is turning decidedly less exciting by the minute. Though as I post that Rhodes goes to Jack

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 15:43

Cricket remains the greatest leveller.

Leicestershire`s no.8 Louis Kimber recorded the most brutal county championship innings ever last week - 243 from 127 balls, ,including 15 sixes and the game`s highest-ever single over score of 43. Today he lasted 15 balls against Middlesex, and was out for a duck.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 16:17

Deja vu is happening in Taunton. Andy Umeed will be bowling before the end and looking more dangerous than Jack again.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 16:50

Though once that has happened Jack may take another one!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 17:23

Presently looking at this game and asking "who looks like taking a wicket?" Not really getting any kind of definitive answer I'm afraid. Brugess does not look in any real trouble and Woakes has the time to set himself up while we strive in the field to hold this in check.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 18:10

Warwickshire seem to believe that the 450 is on within the 110 and seem to be willing to go for it. This is with 7 wickets down. One can only assume that the nature of this wicket will be the same for both sides and we will find this strip as easy to bat on... or will it turn into a minefield for us when we go out there to bat?

If not I'm not sure what you can all look forward to in the next 3 days... a couple of Somerset centuries perhaps.

There is hope in the darkness as Woakes chips one up at 354 and is caught by Umeed from a ball from Pretorius

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 18:29

373 for 8 at 96 overs sees the end of the day.

We need 2 wickets to start the fight back in this game. They need 27 from 14 overs or 77 from the 14 to put the boot in....

If we have a day like them tomorrow then it will be all start again on Tuesday morning with half the game left and all to play for.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 20:46

Well I am back after a long lay-off from photography.
This the first day photos of the Warwickshire match.

There was a cold wind today, didn't expect that on 30th June.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Robert_Yates_ct_Kasey_Aldridge_bld_Migael_Pretorius_.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Robert Yates was caught by Kasey Aldridge bowled by Migael Pretorius.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Michael_Burgess_6_runs_.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Michael Burgess hitting 6 runs, I hope Somerset batsman can score like they did.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Dan_Mousley_ct_Tom_Banton_bld_Migael_Pretorius_1.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Dan Mousley managed an edge off Migael Pretorius caught Tom Bantom.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Dan_Mousley_ct_Tom_Banton_bld_Migael_Pretorius_2.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Celebrating the wicket of Dan Mousley,

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Chris_Woakes.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Warwickshire have several good batsmen in their team this is Chris Woakes

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Jacob_Bethell_ct_James_Rew_bld_Craig_Overton.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Jacob Bethell caught by James Rew bowled Craig Overton.
I made an error with this photo, the caption was correct for another photo that I can't find. Correctly pointed out Craig is at slip so he couldn't have been bowling.

That's all folks.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:04:09:33:00 by Mike TA1.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 20:55

Great to have your photos back Mike !

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Des Platt (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 21:26

Quote:
Grizzers
Great to have your photos back Mike !
Grizzers

Agreed Grizzers. Hoping the cold didn’t get into your bones too much Mike. I’ve had a day off from freezing today ; the crowd at Southport looked very cold in the little bit I saw.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 30/06/2024 21:43

Thanks, Michael. You've still got it.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Wickham (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 00:50

Many thanks, Mike. It’s good to see that you haven’t lost your touch!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 11:20

Raining at the cricket with 700 ish kids in today on the NT Stand... well they were! No idea where they are now.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 11:33

It is clearing from the Quantocks though it is still blanket grey and it is highly unlikely that we will get play before an early lunch I'd suggest. The afternoon looks considerably better.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: dilly (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 11:44

I expect they are all having their bags searched.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 11:57

Early lunch at 12:30

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: dilly (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 12:13

Anyone who is driving there this afternoon remember you can use the Viridor carpark: they've moved out.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 12:27

Though if you are driving anywhere in Somerset today then good luck.

The M5 has a major incident that has closed it both ways for 6 miles around Brigy and it is Glastonbury 'kick out' day.

On Thursday they closed the WSM road from just outside Bristol and diverted everything going down into Somerset via the A38 to the airport. They then closed the A38 at Churchill and diverted everything into WSM through Banwell.

So....... A303 is about the only road until you are the other side of Weston and if you are presently on the M5... sorry it doesn't look quick.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 13:07

1:10 start

2 x 2.5 hour sessions

Tea 3:40

Close at 6:30

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 13:34

A knick to third man brings up the Warks 400 (and makes the follow on target 250+ Still 7 overs until the cutoff point.

It may be moving a little more but not a lot going on. Maybe if Ben Green was in the team to do his thing?

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 13:49

"Miggy P" whips in with the 9th wicket and the other bowling bonus point just 3 overs short of the 110th.

Also brings up his 5-fer 5 for 103

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 13:55

Never mind the rest of this season..................one would imagine that Mr Hurry must be thinking about putting a contract in front of Migael P for future seasons?

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 14:07

He got a bit of movement at the end of his spell. Now watch it spit weave and hoop for Brum while we look to get past 262

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 14:17

Woakes to TKC.... "every ball an adventure" He looked to put the 3rd into the Tone (missed it) and dropped the fourth short of first slip... but we arew an over down qnd Tom Lammonby isn't out there yet!!

The Andy Umeed hits Hanon-Dalby for six ball two!!

Red ball opening - the Somerset way (Sm22)

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 14:19

And we are one down after four balls of the second over... who had ball number 10 on the lottery?

Andy Umeed is supposed to be the stable quiet one!!

(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:01:14:21:02 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 14:45

Trying far too hard to shed the “blocker,” tag. We’ve already seen he can play shots and he doesn’t need to go overboard trying to remind us. At risk of losing his place to give Dickson yet another go if he doesn’t remember what we need up top!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 14:54

All our top six are nervy starters. The only one who seems to have come to terms with it is Tom Lammonby. They all come into their own at different times in their innings and need to be aware of that. The shot for six wasn't a bad shot at all. It just really didn't ought to be an option in ANY of our bats heads at the start of a red ball innings. |

Settle, THEN open up. Andy's place in this side is by no means established so he ought to be more aware of the need to score a quantity of runs rather than looking to impress with the quality of his only scoring shot in an innings chasing over 400

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 15:12

51 for 2 in the 15th. NOW you start to build (hoping you haven't lost 2 wickets by that time)

51 for 0 would have been better

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 15:35

Might have been useful to have Ben Green at Taunton for this match.

He snared 4-28 today on loan to Leicestershire- all of them top-order batters -- as Middlesex were rumbled out for 86. Not surprisingly, Lewis Goldsworthy didn`t get a bowl, but he top scored in Leicestershire`s first innings with 41.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:01:19:43:16 by cricketjerry-mouse.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 16:39

Didn't he end up with 75?

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 16:54

Lewis Goldsworthy`s 75 was in Leicestershire`s second innings - again his side`s top score. They are currently 404 ahead, so he will have plenty of runs to play with if called on for a bowl in Middlesex`s second knock.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 17:19

Well played Tom Banton... the 'stabilising influence' in the Somerset line-up (Sm22)

There is a man who is working hard against type to do the right thing for his side.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 17:38

Well played the Toms with a 100 partnership from 174 balls. 157/3 They've pout us back into this one but the job isn't over.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 17:54

A 110 ball 50 with 3 fours - shows how he has had to work for that 174 for 3.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 19:12

Mister Pretorius
Happy and glorious


No no. Please don't thank me.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 19:46

Good bowling by Mr H-D towards the end. He likes playing at Taunton rather too much for my liking.

Bit of a haphazard batting effort. Good by Tom A & B, but we still have a great deal of work to do to make this game safe.

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 01/07/2024 20:46

Day 2 photos of the Warwickshire match.

Mostly batsmen playing shots.

It is most discouraging watching Somerset play at times.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Lammonby_ct_Michael_Burgess_bld_Ed_Barnard.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Tom Lammonby caught Michael Burgess bowled Ed Barnard.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Lammonby_(1).jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Tom Lammonby did play some good shots before getting out.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Banton_(5).jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

I do love watching Tom Banton play his shots.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Michael_Burgess_ct_Jack_Leach_bld_Kasey_Aldridge.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

I was critical of Michael Burgess playing for himself and not the team, several singles were turned down trying to reach 150. in the end he failed to achieve it, he was caught Jack Leach bowled Kasey Aldridge going for a big shot.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Banton_(7).jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Another nice shot by Tom Banton, I do love watching him play when he is in good nick.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Banton_short_ball.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

They tried getting Tom Banton out by delivering a well directed ball at his head, he did well to get out of the way of it.

Tom Banton was out when I was leaving the ground, then look what happened before I got home.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 10:59

55 needed and the new ball in 14 overs. Someone has said this morning 'Rew is due' Cross the fingers!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 11:02

104 overs in the day and Tom Abell has alr3eady gone in the first over to Booth (who bowled really well from both ends yesterday) LBW for 61 playing all around a full toss third ball of the day.

Still 55 needed

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 11:24

Kasey really had to work hard to get caught off that one. Moved his feet to get into position to give that one.... Captain is now on the spot as Mr Aldridge goes back into the hutch.

41 still needed 2 wickets left... will they enforce the follow on? Think so? Will we cock it up in the second innings? Well present performance might suggest the same response... think so.

James Rew has not been involved yet this morning.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 11:41

And a batting point!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 11:59

A good 50 partnership off 54 balls... mostly from the skipper who is doing his job well.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 12:21

128 behind.

Hannon-Dalby and Booth bowled well Berthel did his job

Umeed? Meh TKC Meh Lammonby OK Banton Good Davey Meh, Leach got one, Abell poor dismissal but good, Aldridge Meh, Rew Meh, Pretorius good delivery

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 12:25

Decidedly second best, so far. Tighter bowling required, second time around, to ensure the draw.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 13:10

It is decidedly cold in the wind today... it looks sunny and dry but it is definitely NOT warm.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 13:12

Lunch 25 for 0 after 10

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 13:38

Excellent to see some 1300 kids playing bat and ball on the pitch at lunch though

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 14:21

The scoring rate here is worse than Trent Bridge last week - can you believe that?

25 from 10 and now 17 from the 7 after Lunch Pretty sure where this one is going based on today and the possible weather tomorrow (though it is getting better on the BBC).

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 15:07

They've sped up. I fear that we could be put in with 10 or so overs to go tonight and then a full/nearly full day to bat tomorrow under grey skies

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 15:10

And the 100 arrives from 31 overs - it's moving on but not what you would call 'quickly'

Warks are 228 ahead with 10 wickets in hand. What is a declarable target here and when do they need to get to it for it to be realistic to put us in and try to get us out?

There are 54 over to go tonight.

(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:02:15:12:18 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 15:17

They are now going at almost 4 and a half an over. Another 35 at that rate yields ~150 runs putting them ~380/390 ahead. Is that enough to then give us a tricky few overs tonight plus the whole of tomorrow less any weather interruptions. With our batting fragility if I were Warks I'd go for it
Edit - those two quick wickets have caused the runs to dry up completely - well done boys. Unless they start firing again I now can't see a declaration today



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:02:15:43:14 by Rod1883.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 15:58

The scoring rate is most definitely not going at that kind of rate, though we are moving towards Tea and it might change after the break. Not a lot going on at the moment.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 17:09

Rhodes flatbats a straight one into the hands of Rew from Ovderton The Somerset fightback is on with Warwickshire a mere 298 ahead with 7 wickets left!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 17:23

The Heat is ON

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 17:58

The 200 is up so they are 328 ahead with 18 overs to go tonight.

So... unless they go mad it will be less 400 to take into tomorrow so bat until just before lunch and have a pop either side of the break and on into the afternoon?

Anyone up for the draw?

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 18:53

The lead is now over 400. They'll swing for the last couple of overs and put us in tomorrow morning I'm sure. Going to be a tough day tomorrow

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 02/07/2024 20:14

The third day of the Warwickshire match photos.

I will leave you to decide what sort of day it has been. My day was frustrated because of a fielder being in the way of taking photos.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/James_Rew_4_runs_xkQ3mgyxSzEQ9191dsaX3z.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

I hoped for a few more runs from the likes of James Rew seen hitting 4 runs.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Craig_Overton_4_runs_(2).jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

There was hope of a second batting point if other batsmen helped Craig Overton score runs to help him out, this is one of his fours. It didn't happen.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Alex_Davies_bld_Jack_Leach_9xfvPm7zVVu1Uy8wbSbg5E.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Alex Davies bowled by Jack Leach.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Migael_Pretorius_bld_Olly_Hannon-Dalby.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Migael Pretorius didn't help Craig Overton out, he was out for one bowled by Olly Hannon-Dalby.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Kasey_Aldridge_4_runs_(2).jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Kasey Aldridge hitting four runs.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Robert_Yates_ct_Josh_Davey_bld_Craig_Overton.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Robert Yates trying to hit a six off Craig Overton he didn't make it he was caught by Josh Davey just inside the boundary rope.

Tomorrow will be hard for Somerset to win the match.
.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 10:50

Distinctly grey and windy this morning in TA1

Conversations about Yorkshire in 2009 have been prevelant this morning

Warwickshire have declared with a score of 410 to win in 96 with a possible extra bit in the last hour if we get that far.

Probably the overhead conditions may have had an effect. I'd bowl in this I think.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 11:00

Quote:
Grockle
Conversations about Yorkshire in 2009 have been prevelant this morning

Get Trego out of the commentary box!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 11:33

Well it was interesting while it lasted 30 off 26 for Umeed. It was a start but it was also a 'flap' at a ball he really shouldn't have 'flapped' at.

The prediction of Tom L being in within 5 balls was a bit pessimistic but hes still in with the opening bowlers and a shiny ball.

Ahh well... onwards

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 11:36

As someone said yesterday, O H-D does like Taunton, wonder if we should sign him

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 11:39

50 partnership in the 9th off 53 balls..... progress.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 12:46

100 up in 26 - Hmmmmm

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 13:11

So they declare to use the conditions and at lunch YMA O HYD!!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 14:18

And TKC spoils it all with a 'hack' on 49 after 100 balls of waiting. 144 for 3 and in comes Banton.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 14:57

50 for 'Table' but slower than desired I'd suggest

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 15:18

50 Partnership off 97 balls between 'Table' and 'Bants at 194 for 3 with 40 overs to go.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 15:25

200 off a weird one that didn't come off. So Bants tries it again the next ball... didn't work again (Sm105)

But the 200 is up with 38 to go and Tea looming.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 15:42

50 for Tom Banton 76 balls 4 fours and a six. 230 for 3 with 34 overs to go.

5th 50 this year for the man we didn't have a place for.

Tea with Abell on 74 and Bants on 50

180 needed in 33 overs 5 and a half an over

(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:03:16:02:22 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:01

It was an awful dismissal by TKC.

Pitch continues to look utterly dead.

To be honest, I've no idea what the Warks plan was yesterday?

Davies and Yates played positively and, when they were out, Warks were 258 ahead with 8 second innings wickets left, whereupon Sam Hain came out and spent 40 balls over his first 3 runs - I thought it was absolutely ridiculous... were they really thinking about losing at 258 ahead with 8 wickets in hand? If it wasn't fear of defeat, why in God's name fart around for 40 balls over your first 3 runs!?

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:02

Interesting session ahead !

Sun coming out and it feels a little more like summer rather than autumn !

Come on lads. This is gettable.

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:03

Strap in for the next 10 overs because this will decide this game probably.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:14

100 partnership at 245 152 balls 30 overs to go (plus any last hour additions though it's highly unlikely that Warks will allow those to happen if it gets to squeaky bum time!!)

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:42

Bants goes for 81 and in comes Pretorius

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 16:51

Migael in now shows intent. Hope it doesn't backfire

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 17:10

Gerrin!! Tom Abell 100 off 171 at 309 for 5 with 101 to get in 17

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 17:17

2 fine blows from James Rew takes the score to 325 as the final hour starts with 16 overs to be bowled and 85 needed at 5.3 per over... Just knock it about and take the loose stuff.

New ball is available but Warks haven't yet taken it,

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 17:38

50 partnership off 51 between Rew and Abell

61 needed off 72 balls

250 up 60 off 70

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 17:42

The new ball in Hannon-Dalby's hot little hands with 54 needed off 66

Last throw of the dice people. Hold on to your hats!!

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 17:56

34 from 48 with Rew moving to a 50 with 45 off 43.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:02

Beautiful straight four brings up a great 50 from 49 takes us into the 380s snd another puts us on the brink of the 390s

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Rod1883 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:12

Fantastic, well done the team. Didn't see this result coming a little while after lunch yesterday when Warks had hit the accelerator

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:13

Well, you would not have expected that result after the first innings. Superbly done.

Or indeed after Warwicks' second.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:03:18:15:38 by Bobstan.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:17

Not bad to hit your last four balls for 4, 4, 6, 6 to win the match for your side and surpass your highest-evert first-class score by 1. Well done, Tom Abell.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:33

Second best chase in history for Somerset and it has been great to see both of them. Great for the faithful this afternoon. Shame there weren't more but 4 and a half thousand were online it seems.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:43

Rew hasn’t had the best season with the bat, so that cracking 50 to finish it will have been a boon for him. Just a shame that there’s no immediate chance to build on it in red ball.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Shepton Paul 2 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 18:49

Brilliant win! I’ve been at a funeral all day, cheered me up immensely to come home to that. Must’ve been a great watch, first time we’ve chased over 400 to win without anyone called Pete Trego in the team 🤔👏👏👏

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Des Platt (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 19:30

Wonderful result on a marvellous day of County Cricket although pity it was a damp squib at Southport . I often prefer watching Somerset to Lancs nowadays but being t an outground I mainly watched Lancs this game. I guess for the lifelong , life suffering Somerset fans it may have been nervous but I turned on just after Rew got in and there never seemed to be any doubt. Apart from my pleasure at seeing Somerset win , I also love seeing Warwickshire lose .

Hoping I’ve made a good decision to come down for the Surrey game in September.

After Somerset’s win , I then watched the Cheltenham game. Plenty of things I should have been doing but with no proper midweek cricket for a long time after today, I treated myself .



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:03:19:32:38 by Des Platt.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Shepton Paul 2 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 20:39

Great day for the County Championship 👍

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 20:58

4th and final day photos against Warwickshire.

One of the best final section of batting I have ever seen, how wrong could I have been when I thought over 400 runs were too many for Somerset to get, (how wrong I Was)

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Banton_4_runs_snBy32wHdT1kzvmnjf9TQ9.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Tom Banton hitting 4 runs.
I have no complaints how any of the batsmen were out going for that large total.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/James_Rew_4_runs_and_his_50.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

James Rew 4 runs and his 50
they all played well.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Abell_finishing_the_match_with_a_6.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

I believe this is Tom Abell second 6 to finish the match.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Andy_Umeed_ct_Michael_Burgess_bld_Olly_Hannon-Dalby.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

A good start for Andy Umeed until he was caught by Michael Burgess bowled by Olly Hannon-Dalby.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Andy_Umeed_4_runs_gb9imiX9pc7H7hEXCry3tR.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Andy Umeed scoring 4 runs.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Kohler-Cadmore_4runs.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Tom Kohler-Cadmore hitting four runs.

https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/p490/cricketphotos1/Tom_Lammonby_7jAQPUtkgumkhrbF7gqZHV.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds

Tom Lammonby.

Second place in the table is very good.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 21:49

That was a simply superb run chase. I only attended one day of this game & chose the right one !

Yes, the pitch was docile, but to score 410 against a first rate bowling attack was a huge achievement. There really wasn't any time during the (flippin' cold !) day when we seemed out of it.

Terrific support from all the batsmen, but Tom Abell must take a bow for that pretty well chanceless innings. James Rew was also superb with his calm temperament just what was needed when the fifth wicket fell with still a hundred plus needed.

And we won despite some very leaden skies and a not insignificant amount of egregious time wasting by Warks., which was treated very leniently by the umpires.

All in all, that was very very impressive.

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 03/07/2024 22:46

Bracey's performance at Cheltenham probably takes the 'Performance of the Round' award but Tom Abell has the second place sown up.

Superb cricket for so many but about 7 weeks before we do it on a 4 day scale again.

Keep the faith people. Support your counties and bollox to the ECB (Sm22)

(Sm72)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:04:10:13:24 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Wickham (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 03:52

What a great start to Thursday. I woke (in New Zealand) to news of the win and have been enjoying watching chunks of a recording of the livestream.
Abell will rightly take the bulk of the plaudits. But I have been especially pleased to see how well Banton has played this year. By all accounts, he has been working hard on his batting. I feel that (by contrast with Buttler, with whom he shares a number of characteristics, but who never properly got to grips with how he should play in first-class cricket) Banton has found a method and rhythm which makes the most of his talents.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Somerset LaLaLa (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 07:38

I was one of the X thousand watching online today, how lucky we are to have the live stream. And then could follow the unbelievable conclusion to the Glos v Glam game. Only red ball cricket, in any sport, can generate such tension and drama. And how good it feels to be a Somerset supporter today!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Shepton Paul 2 (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 08:46

I’m confused. As I said earlier, I was at a funeral near Shepton Mallet for most of yesterday - where it rained a lot for much of the day. It crossed my mind a few times that at least that will help ensure we don’t lose at Taunton - so did it rain at TA1 at all, was any time lost?

Us cricket folk eh, the things we think about 😉

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 10:06

There should never have been any question of losing on that surface.

Simply put, it is near impossible to take wickets vs defensive shots on our fourth day road. Warks took none in 96 overs.... and never looked like taking one. As Trego said, the problem is that, by day four, even if you induce an edge to slip (which isn't easy to do!), it is most unlikely to carry.

I really thought we should just shut up shop and take the draw points since playing dumbslog type shots would have been the only way to lose the eight draw points. In the event? I was impressed by how we managed to keep the rate reasonably within hand without too many slogs. TKC played an awful one. Migael was sent out to slog, so he did what he was told, but mainly - despite a painfully slow surface, we were able to keep it all ticking over without taking undue risks.

Nevertheless, if we are going to kick on from here, then the age old problem remains: how to get more life into these surfaces.

The fact that this was a "second time ever," achievement suggests that we can't expect to win many games this way and common sense also suggests that other counties will have taken note of the result and, unless themselves desperate for results, are unlikely to declare and leave us a chase. Certainly, after the Trego chase, teams fought shy of that for some considerable time. Admittedly, the Trego chase was at a far higher RR than this one (being a shorter chase).

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 10:09

Nobody seems to have noted the irony that this match thread had been given a "rare occurrence," moniker before the game started (I think?) for a reason entirely unrelated to the rare occurrence that eventually ensued!

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 10:16

Courtesy of cjm... I just set it at the top and let it go... every now and again the thread hits the heights 😂😂😂

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 10:27

No time lost SP.

There was the very occasional light shower & the groundstaff did put covers on briefly at lunchtime, but aside from that it was just heavy cloud & the odd sunny interval. The skies became increasingly dark towards the end of the day and it looked quite possible that rain would intervene. Hence the Warks. time wasting was tough to stomach.

It got gloomy enough for the floodlights to be put on with about five overs remaining, but only four balls were needed due to Tom Abell's concluding and very decisive assault.

Grizzers

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Des Platt (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 16:18

AGod ; a Somerset fan on another cricket forum yesterday was saying precisely that ; won’t get any more declarations this season ; or if do , will be chasing 600.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 04/07/2024 16:59

There was water in the wind as Abell got to.100 but it canevto little though it might ha e got them moving.

Yep the Warwickshire press guy called it at half four. He said whatever their plan was in the morning hadn't worked and a declaration og anything less than 450/475 was daft.

He was right and it won't happen again this year.

(Sm72)

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Farmer White (IP Logged)
Date: 21/07/2024 13:21

With the Vitality Blast in abeyance until September and the Metro Bank One Day Cup proper not starting until the end of the week, here are the links for a look back at the astonishing Championship victory against Warwickshire:

Day 1: A toss to remember: [farmerwhite.co.uk]

Day 2: Warwickshire in the ascendant: [farmerwhite.co.uk]

Day 3: Push and counter-push: [farmerwhite.co.uk]

Day 4: A stunning victory and the watcher on the Trescothick Pavilion terrace: [farmerwhite.co.uk]

Farmer



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:07:21:13:31:02 by Grockle.

Re: Warwickshire - rare occurrence
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 21/07/2024 18:11

Thank you Farmer. Sat here watching England near victory in the second test with Bash making his mark I have reenjoyed the last day of that match with Warks. Deep joy as I was there all day on day four and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. A rerun was wonderful.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net